TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers: Hold tight london is so old!! - TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers

Jump to content

home

Forum

Hold tight london is so old!!

  • 3 Pages
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot reply to this topic

#1 sadie   User is offline

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 26-January 05

Posted 27 January 2005 - 2:47 PM

Hold tight london was out years ago. Did anyone know that? :)

#2 Skylined   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 532
  • Joined: 22-January 05
  • LocationUruguay

Posted 27 January 2005 - 3:21 PM

What do you mean?
Posted Image

#3 Pringled   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 843
  • Joined: 12-January 05

Posted 27 January 2005 - 3:28 PM

explain this

#4 sadie   User is offline

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 26-January 05

Posted 27 January 2005 - 3:41 PM

well years ago it was wrote but never released, the original had lots more on it. but it was still done by the chembros! :)

#5 Pjbn_74   User is offline

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 46
  • Joined: 25-January 05

Posted 27 January 2005 - 3:46 PM

And you thought this warranted starting a new thread? No wonder the old timers here are getting pissed off.

Many bands write tunes at different stages of their careers, but not necessarily record them. They might have felt that a song or tune is not suitable for a particular period or album and so shelve it for the future.

#6 sadie   User is offline

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 26-January 05

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:05 PM

its not that they didn't think it was suitable, it was a tune that was made for a film, but that film was never released due to bugget. so thats why!!!

if you get so wound up with people making threads that don't quite have a point to them, don't reploy to them. it was just thought, and i never ask to get abuse.

:?

#7 chemicalreaction   User is online

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:09 PM

Chems making a soundtrack .Hmmm....what are your sources ???

#8 sadie   User is offline

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 26-January 05

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:13 PM

It was a conversation, i was having with someone last night over the internet, from queensland, aussie. not that i find that a very good source, just thought it was a subject i ought to of put to you guys, thought someone would know. that's all :?

#9 Skylined   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 532
  • Joined: 22-January 05
  • LocationUruguay

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:17 PM

... I think there's nothing to say, right?
Posted Image

#10 chemicalreaction   User is online

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:18 PM

i don't trust those crocodile hunters anyway.

#11 sadie   User is offline

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 26-January 05

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:21 PM

might have been bullshit, but it definatley was done yrs ago. :)

#12 Skylined   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 532
  • Joined: 22-January 05
  • LocationUruguay

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:25 PM

Do you have the name of the movie, or something that will prove that you're right?
Posted Image

#13 ACIDCHILDREN   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3566
  • Joined: 07-September 04

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:30 PM

do u mean the chems made it years ago or the chems have covered or sampled and used material that was used for this movie years ago?

#14 sadie   User is offline

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 26-January 05

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:32 PM

they didnt know what it was called for sure, he couldn't really remember,which made me think maybe not. :?

#15 chemicalreaction   User is online

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:33 PM

a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. now you got us all curious. I will get bottom of this.

#16 sadie   User is offline

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 26-January 05

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:38 PM

well i would like to know myself, gonna try and find out the info from else where. then maybe it would be a bit more convincing. :)

#17 TryptaJunk   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 174
  • Joined: 25-January 05

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:40 PM

yeah that is iteresting.. I can easily imagine the Chems writing an early version of this tune years ago and then deciding to come bak to it and have a guest vocalist singing on it.



I'm sure they have many jewels on their hard disk just waiting to be recorded (think about otter rock... )

#18 ACIDCHILDREN   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3566
  • Joined: 07-September 04

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:41 PM

I think its bullshit. I cant see it being made ages ago by the Chems and us not hereing of it, or there being no release.

#19 sadie   User is offline

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 26-January 05

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:43 PM

nice to know that someone has the same views as i do. they always were so capable of doing stuff like that. nice one chembros ;-)

#20 sadie   User is offline

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 26-January 05

Posted 27 January 2005 - 4:45 PM

well that's nice to know, your opinion, so... :P
  • 3 Pages
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users