Ed is (was ?) in the place ! I missed that
Could you explain us the signification of K+D+B ? It's the MORE important question about Further ! lol

If you read me Ed, don't forget that every people here is on the forum because they love your work, your music, and the way you are sharing this with us. Don't forget that.

dubstep? boring?

eat this:

It's wobbloring

There's not enough diversity in dubstep to excite me. In the end (for me) most of it is just a wobbly synth going "wuhwuwhwuhuhwuhw wohwohowohwoh whihiwhihiwhwhi whahahwahwhahw" with badly offbeat drums over top of it. And I don't like that, there's not enough creativity there for me to enjoy it.


p.s.

chemicalmat, on 07 July 2010 - 04:20 PM, said:

hear hear

Okay, So after listening to the above I can't say it's boring (I never said it was....I think), but it confuses me and I think I should elaborate.

I am so accustomed after listening to electronic beats for over more than a decade now (actually its close to 2 if I consider my early dance mix cds in the early 90s, anyways) to more fluid genres at a danceable beat where I can see myself getting hype on a dancefloor, yes, even forms of breaks, minimal, and IDM. Amost all of the Dubstep I've heard lacks the danceable beat to me. I literally feel as though I am moving to slow. If it were straight dub I would enjoy it more as something to relax to. But the majority of dubstep puts in those fast, hard moving bass and synth lines that feel like they are rushing the beat to catch up to a tempo that it never can (hence my earlier blue balls comment). I like dub electronic dub beats like kode9, but there it feels more proper to chill to it.



Maybe its starting to get to the point where the younger teenage generation is trying to make more hiphop inspired electronic beats and I just don't understand it and I am an old cranky bastard at the age of 24

Rynostar, on 08 July 2010 - 03:25 AM, said:

What just the Blokes! Rachael got a bit of a heckle somewhere on this forum for her live show remarks! That just proves there isn't enough ladies on this forum to even get a mention! Forum Mummy needs to produce more girls

by the way... JEANIE WHERE ARE YOU? *looks around*


The terms DubStep and Minimal mean nothing to me, sub genres are BS.

That was a sweet thing to say, Chemicalmat... I am sure Ed knows we love what they do but it is still nice to put it out there in a post, like you did. If we weren't passionate then we wouldn't bother sticking around the forum for better or worse. And if he didn't care what goes on or what's being said here, then he wouldn't bother with this place either. He's cool like that (and Tom is pretty cool, too, probably laughing at us and our silly ways haha)

And kwiddle is right, us girls are so outnumbered here!

btw Maboul/Internet Bloke, I have to commend your spirit, man. You certainly managed to catch the negative attention of someone you admire enough to spend all day on his forum, then rolled with the name change, lol

Dubstep is very danceable. I can understand someone who says "I, personally, don't want to dance to dubstep" but to say one can't dance to it is wrong. Think about dancing to jump up but twice as slow (well, even more than twice). If people can dance to club rap music, people can dance to dubstep.

@kwiddle, Crap, little bit of a bastard moment there for me forgeting the birds. Slap me out.

@android, can I leave it to a combanation of the two statements you made. It's just not my style. Another point where someone is likely to come out of no where and slap me out. Sorry.

androidgeoff, on 08 July 2010 - 05:21 AM, said:

To be honest, the "danceable" potential of a music is not part of the criteria that make me like it or not.
I'm just more a fan of heavy beats, awesome synths or everything that can make a track kick some ass. Dubstep is too slow and "empty", I can only fall asleep with that.


...anyway, Laurent Garnier has a radio broadcast called "It is what it is" and once he played a dubstep track that I actually liked. This one :

I like this track cause it's really dark. It won't make me like dubstep cause that "wobble" thing and the slowness generally make it lose my intention but I like the darkness feeling in that track.

@Kwiddle:

Rynostar, on 07 July 2010 - 09:30 PM, said:

I apologize if I appeared to attack anyone for not liking dubstep. I don't want to say "hey you are bad for not liking it." I'm not even trying to defend the genre, just trying to say that you CAN dance to it!

You think dubstep sucks? You think minimal sucks even more? You've never ever experienced the most awful genre there is:

brother_ging, on 07 July 2010 - 11:47 PM, said:

I'm with Maboul. That track is very boring and uninteresting. I do like a few dubstep tracks though. All the rest is a copy/paste of the same track over and over again, with the same synth, the same boring beat...

Some Minimal tracks are madder than many many techno tracks.



I experienced this 2 track in club, and I can say you thay are unbelievable.

when i drop audion's mouth to mouth everbody gets nuts. perfect closer for a warm up set. but i don't think it's minimal. minimum tech house track or more (=techno).

last try for some dubstep:

This is how you dance to Dubstep BIATCH!



Also Nero

I guess Ed likes coming here now. Maybe he went cold turkey on The Sims!

Can Tom come out and play?...We never had both of them here at the same time.

I pass on Dubstep, some minimal is OK!

iguanapunk, on 09 July 2010 - 01:17 AM, said:

haha ... that's a crack up.