TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers: Hanna - TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers

Jump to content

home

Forum

Hanna

  • 44 Pages
  • +
  • « First
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • Last »
  • You cannot reply to this topic

#341 The bloke off the internet   User is offline

  • Acid child clown
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2305
  • Joined: 07-November 08
  • LocationLeiden

Posted 16 March 2011 - 5:00 AM

View PostProbass, on 15 March 2011 - 10:58 PM, said:

Just buy it twice - once on iTunes vinyl and once on CD.


Fixed.

By the way, do you think they put all the tracks the Chems made on the OST ? I mean if you listen to the whole thing, it's just around 50 minutes long, wich is quite short. I read somewhere that Tron Legacy features some tracks that weren't released on the OST so it might be the same for Hanna. Also I wonder if the tracks on the OST appear in the same order as in the movie.

And already burnt a CD of course !
Roses are red
Violets are blue
And I will rape
Each one of you

View Postinchemwetrust, on 12 August 2011 - 11:00 AM, said:

For those who haven't seen them, I only have one thing to say.....Ha Ha!

View PostThePumisher, on 04 September 2013 - 10:01 AM, said:

i didn't wear pants at home ;)

#342 BoywiththeGoldenEyes   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4044
  • Joined: 05-November 04
  • LocationSarrebruck

Posted 16 March 2011 - 8:58 AM

Love the discussions here, would like to give some replies

View PostProbass, on 15 March 2011 - 10:58 PM, said:

Just buy it twice - once on iTunes and once on CD. I did it with Further, and I think it is worth it since it supports the artistic process.


I don't see the use of that. Once you have the CD you can easily import it to iTunes, so why also download? Rather get yourself something real and buy the CD and the vinyl, this is what I have always done and will always do. It seems Hanna might be the first exception to that as no physical release scheduled so far - what makes you think there's going to be one?


View PostWhiteNoise, on 15 March 2011 - 11:13 PM, said:

I did a lot of the Further Wallpapers, doing the FurtherRemixed art, made that seesounds poster, and also designed K+D+B Cereal. :cool:

Yes, I did use exiting material but it was appropiate for the kind of stuff I was doing. Since I'm trying to make something professional and offical-looking, I'm going to use the original artwork out there for it. It's almost mandatory really, trying to recreate those images myself would be difficult and bit stupid.

@ Goldeneyes - I'm gonna try to make one, ich habe eine Idee.


it's just fair! most graphic designers work that way, hm? "talent borrows, genius steals" (Oscar Wilde)- and as long as the results are something unique and have a distinct character everything is fine with that.

cannot wait to see your artwork, wn!


View PostProbass, on 16 March 2011 - 12:29 AM, said:

Is anyone hearing alot of the bird from the "bird cymbals" in Hanna vs. Marissa?


xeah a lot of them. a lot! (somehow I managed to get Hanna, hm)


View PostWhiteNoise, on 16 March 2011 - 2:12 AM, said:

That's like saying that The Chemical Brothers can't take any thanks or credit for Under The Influence since they sampled the drums from Francine McGee's Delirium.


Posted Image


absolutely agree here, and the h.p. pic is epic, sooo much better a cover it would have been for that CD given away for free with that newspaper in the UK. brilliant.


View Postmx/, on 16 March 2011 - 3:03 AM, said:

Been listening to this all day...it so damn good! only thing I don't like is the cover + the only digital release format...So I made this to print it on a cardboard sleeve and make my own physical copy for my collection :)

Posted Image



yup, quite cool!
love is all.

#343 Joslyn   User is offline

  • Lurking about
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1738
  • Joined: 20-May 03
  • LocationHere

Posted 16 March 2011 - 1:22 PM

So listening to it right now and again after it. It's a soundtrack that creates a lot of atmosphere with keeping the Chemical Brothers sound in there. I wonder if it's in chronological order, have to wait for the movie for that. 50 minutes of OST, makes you wonder how long the movie itself we be.
I have no end-verdict yet except being good, Escape Wavefold stands out.

#344 Joslyn   User is offline

  • Lurking about
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1738
  • Joined: 20-May 03
  • LocationHere

Posted 16 March 2011 - 2:19 PM

View Postsatur8, on 16 March 2011 - 12:01 AM, said:

I respectfully disagree here. It's true there are a few clever features in iTunes, but most of them are for show. As a music lover, I don't need a player to compile a playlist for me as long as I tag my tunes properly and I never sort by cover art. iTunes is a large, intrusive application, it is not the best media player for editing ID3 tags, and I don't particularly care for it's limited functionality on my iPhone. As a matter of fact, as soon as my contract is up, I am trading in my iPhone for an EVO just so I never have to use iTunes again.

Why would I want to install a (large and intrusive) app just so I can just purchase (music), convert it, and then play it in some other media player? I've made my feeling known many times on the subject of mp3 only releases (hate them), and I am even more turned off by them when they are exclusive to iTunes. iTunes is great for some, but not all. It's true iTunes is the industry standard, but how often is the popular choice really the best one? Even if it was the best one, there should still be alternatives. I find purchasing music and being limited to 256kps offensive, DRM or no. Record labels (and their sales and marketing departments) still do not know how to successfully navigate the digital market after all these years. iTunes is their best compromise since the battle began with Napster, and they have decided to inundate the youth rather than compromise on a solution for those that remember browsing music on the shelves. In other words, it is never a good sign when one outlet is favored by the corporations trying to influence the youth.

Probass - This is by no means an attack on you. I just don't find solace in settling for something that appear convenient, and I am not alone.

For the record, my preferred player or choice is Media Monkey. I'm open to suggestions is someone recommends a better option.
Also, no, I won't buy it twice. I'll buy just about any physical release by an artist I respect. In turn, if they don't make it available to me except in a digital format which I do not support with my dollar, than I will find another way. Someone along the line signs an agreement with iTunes to ultimately save money and increase profit margin. Fine by me. I'll save mine, too.



Reading your comment on iTunes I have to ask you a question. The coolest feature on iTunes is that you can download cover art to add to your mp3 file. I know of no other player that can do that. Even Gracenote sucks at what is does. Do you know other players that gives you the oppertunity to download cover art? ( yeah I read you don't care much about cover art but maybe you know the answer to my question)

#345 innerwatch   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 284
  • Joined: 26-February 05
  • LocationVersailles, FRA

Posted 16 March 2011 - 2:32 PM

To me iTunes is a free media player before anything else, when I started using it the store didn't even exist.

#346 Joslyn   User is offline

  • Lurking about
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1738
  • Joined: 20-May 03
  • LocationHere

Posted 16 March 2011 - 4:34 PM

Ok I listened 3 times in a row now to this soundtrack.
If the album is in chronological order (the same order as in the movie itself) I think we've seen the most exciting stuff in the trailer. Probably the movie won't be longer than 100 minutes.
Hanna's theme vocal version seems to be the track for the end credits. Container Park would be the climax/conclusion of the film. Or maybe Container park is the first track for the end credits and Escape Wavefold is the climax movie part.
Most intersting about the soundtrack are all the short soundbites. It seems not only the soundtrack creates the atmosphere in the movie but the sounds THEMSELVES are created by the Chemical Brothers.
IMO the tracks on Hanna are better and create more atmosphere than Daft Punks Tron Legacy soundtrack but that Tron soundtrack is a better album as a whole.
Maybe that's the greatest acomplisment by Tom and Ed, not to create an album as/for themselves but an actual sound for the movie.

#347 chemicalmat   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 579
  • Joined: 23-December 06

Posted 16 March 2011 - 4:58 PM

I'm pretty sure that the album soundtrack doesn't fit the film order.
We saw a trailer with "escape wavefold" used on the escape of Hanna, and this happen on the first part of the film (logic), but "escape wavefold" is the 18th track...

I'm surprised nobody noticed they use the "lfo effect" in "interrogation/lonesome subway", the same they are using live at the beginning of Snow since the Rounhouse last year ^^

#348 The bloke off the internet   User is offline

  • Acid child clown
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2305
  • Joined: 07-November 08
  • LocationLeiden

Posted 16 March 2011 - 5:53 PM

I also hear some sounds from Horse Power in Hanna vs Marissa.

View PostBoywiththeGoldenEyes, on 16 March 2011 - 9:58 AM, said:

"talent borrows, genius steals" (Oscar Wilde)


Isn't that from Pablo Picasso ?
Roses are red
Violets are blue
And I will rape
Each one of you

View Postinchemwetrust, on 12 August 2011 - 11:00 AM, said:

For those who haven't seen them, I only have one thing to say.....Ha Ha!

View PostThePumisher, on 04 September 2013 - 10:01 AM, said:

i didn't wear pants at home ;)

#349 BoywiththeGoldenEyes   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4044
  • Joined: 05-November 04
  • LocationSarrebruck

Posted 16 March 2011 - 6:32 PM

View PostThe bloke off the internet, on 16 March 2011 - 6:53 PM, said:

I also hear some sounds from Horse Power in Hanna vs Marissa.



Isn't that from Pablo Picasso ?



no, it's most definitely from oscar wilde. picasso said "bad artists copy. great artists steal" but picasso lived a bit later than wilde.
love is all.

#350 satur8   User is offline

  • old-head
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 663
  • Joined: 03-June 07
  • LocationDeleware, USA

Posted 16 March 2011 - 6:39 PM

View PostJoslyn, on 16 March 2011 - 10:19 AM, said:

Reading your comment on iTunes I have to ask you a question. The coolest feature on iTunes is that you can download cover art to add to your mp3 file. I know of no other player that can do that. Even Gracenote sucks at what is does. Do you know other players that gives you the oppertunity to download cover art? ( yeah I read you don't care much about cover art but maybe you know the answer to my question)


Good question. This definitely falls into one of the convenient iTunes advantages.

I use a program called 'Tag and Rename' for my ID3 files and images. I do this outside of my media player (along with downloading the cover artwork from Google). It's an extra step, but sometimes I find tasks such as this relaxing if I get downtime. I will do this type of "paperwork" task when sitting undisturbed reviewing new music. The only detractor is when I fall behind.

If I haven't said so before, I am very much looking forward to this soundtrack. The extremely positive reviews are exciting and I like what I've heard so far.
Gonna work it out...

#351 iguanapunk   User is offline

  • Tatsumaki-Senpū kyaku
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9574
  • Joined: 27-February 03
  • Location[-+-]

Posted 16 March 2011 - 7:37 PM

View PostWhiteNoise, on 16 March 2011 - 1:12 AM, said:

That's like saying that The Chemical Brothers can't take any thanks or credit for Under The Influence since they sampled the drums from Francine McGee's Delirium.

There's a ton of creativity in UTI regarding everything else, but the drums were done by someone else's existing work and thus Tom and Ed can't take any credit for the track. Well, that's obviously wrong. It's the same thing for my images, I used existing artwork but I built off of it heavily.

85% of that was done myself, but I used the Horse Power horse so I can't take credit for it? Doesn't make sense.

Original artwork would imply that everything was designed by the artist and was not taken from any outside sources. Therefore I'd have to dress a black man in a tight suit with blue lights and take pictures of him to make an 'original' Escape Velocity wall paper.

And difficulty is not a problem. My inital Dissolve wallpaper for example:

I had to silhouette the umbrella guy, invert the colors, then splice in bits and pieces of the psychedelic background of Dissolve carefully enough behind both the guy, the logo and the floor line. It sounds simple, but trying to work out how to get each piece in there to both clearly define the guy, umbrella, logo, and line and not have it look pasted together, and make it look smooth and professional too, was really painstaking. It took nearly the whole day to do.


I think if we're going to make comparisons we should stick to the medium of art. If René Magritte took Salvador Dali's melting clocks
Posted Image
and put it into his work, do you think that would be acceptable? There are stock images available to use but with doing so, you must credit the photographer so therefore it is not truly your work.

85%? Where did you come up with this percentage? It's completely erroneous! The main focal point of that image is a horse created by somebody else. You can take credit for drawing on somebody elses artwork, but that is all.

Why on Earth would you have to dress a man in black? You really do not have an imagination do you? You can create orginal art and still stay true to the theme of the album.

This is the trouble now days, everybody has access to an image editing suite such as Photoshop so they think they're an artist by applying a few automatic filters to a piece of somebody elses work.
Posted Image

#352 iguanapunk   User is offline

  • Tatsumaki-Senpū kyaku
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9574
  • Joined: 27-February 03
  • Location[-+-]

Posted 16 March 2011 - 7:39 PM

View PostCsar, on 16 March 2011 - 2:01 AM, said:

Glad I could help! Why did I have to kick your butt with my long dalashim-foot anyway to get you going again?

So, to make you stop whining, take the following as an appreciation of your artistic skills: Make me an all-new signature! Only requirement: include my slogan!

And btw:


Back in the old days, you would have given a shit about that! :twisted:


Ok, I will give it a go once I am back on PC as my beautiful CRT monitor blew up and now I've gone over to the dark side and had to buy (due to the fact nobody makes CRT's anymore) an LCD :cry:

In the old days, I used to drink a lot. I don't drink anymore.
Posted Image

#353 whirlygirl   User is offline

  • dork
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 15302
  • Joined: 06-November 02
  • Locationin the valley of the acid clowns

Posted 16 March 2011 - 11:11 PM

View Postiguanapunk, on 16 March 2011 - 12:37 PM, said:

I think if we're going to make comparisons we should stick to the medium of art. If René Magritte took Salvador Dali's melting clocks
Posted Image
and put it into his work, do you think that would be acceptable? There are stock images available to use but with doing so, you must credit the photographer so therefore it is not truly your work.

85%? Where did you come up with this percentage? It's completely erroneous! The main focal point of that image is a horse created by somebody else. You can take credit for drawing on somebody elses artwork, but that is all.

Why on Earth would you have to dress a man in black? You really do not have an imagination do you? You can create orginal art and still stay true to the theme of the album.

This is the trouble now days, everybody has access to an image editing suite such as Photoshop so they think they're an artist by applying a few automatic filters to a piece of somebody elses work.


Wow there's like 3 different conversations going on in this thread, hahaha. It's like a pub in here!

But I would like to just state my piece here.

In my opinion the lines are easily blurred between borrowing and stealing in terms of artwork. There are as many shades of gray in this area as there are shades of green. There's also fine art, and commercial art.

The Horse Power image that WhiteNoise made is really cool and I like the latin slant and the overall art direction he used. However if push came to shove, and WhiteNoise started making money off his Horse Power image you can bet some tails would be ruffled as far as copyrights are concerned.


Is it really unoriginal to take a piece of artwork and add some personal touches and call it original? I don't know. I don't think that's our call. I don't know if photoshop programs are the trouble, either.

I remember getting into a 'discussion' with another artist when I worked at Tower (when I was doing displays). We needed another person in the art department so I asked this girl who worked behind the register if she was interested. I knew she was going to art school so I thought she'd be the perfect person to ask. But when I did, I basically got lectured with her ridiculous diatribe on how she was a 'real' artist who painted 'real and original' artwork and that basically, what I was doing was pop commercial shit. Even if I was adding my own style and technique, it was still shit because I was basically "copying" album covers, as she put it.

Anyway. Not really sure where I'm going with this. I definitely see where you're coming from but I also see where WN is at, too. I don't think it's entirely fair to imply a lack of originality.
be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle

#354 Probass   User is offline

  • First a warning, musical; then the hour, irrevocable.
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1464
  • Joined: 13-January 05
  • LocationOklahoma, USA

Posted 17 March 2011 - 3:07 AM

View PostKrisper, on 15 March 2011 - 6:42 PM, said:

I am about 80% through an IT degree at the moment and I have now had formal training in assembly, C, C++ and Java, and for websites xml, html, php, css, javascript. Pretty soon I have to do Perl and Python. Not that you get taught anything in great detail at uni, but I do now understand most of the code I use, especially when using code samples. Before I used to borrow code, it would work but I often had no idea how or why.

My preferred language? For websites I use php to generate the latest valid xhtml using data from a mysql database. That is what I do to make most of my money. For programs for PC I want to become good at C++ as it is very powerful, but it is also very complex. I don't have much call for that these days, only on a hobby basis. Most of my current programs are still in VB6. And I've done a few phone apps, android and blackberry both have a Java IDE so they are reasonably simple. For iPhone I had to buy a Mac and learn XCode which is a derivative of C. It was tough in the beginning, but once I got the basics it is not too difficult.


Excellent. I've been doing a little programming in C++ for my lab job. I mostly use an OpenGL library called COIN3D to create fairly rudimentary models of various things. I've learned the basics of animation, using engine nodes and whatnot. Then I utilize mostly borrowed code to create CAVElib apps that put it on a 3D VR system.
Otherwise, I've used Java for my basic programming classes. I'm interested in learning C#—
from what I have heard, it is something between C++ and Java. I'm not fond of Java for some reasons, such as it being rather "wordy" when all you want to do is a cout, but at other times I miss using the +operator as concatenation.
I actually started out in webdesign, and I've been wanting to self-teach myself some more javascript. Have you seen the Katamari javascript?
javascript:var i,s,ss=['http://kathack.com/js/kh.js','http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.5.1/jquery.min.js'];for(i=0;i!=ss.length;i++){s=document.createElement('script');s.src=ss[i];document.body.appendChild(s);}void(0);

It is pretty awesome, try injecting it! :smile:
<img src="http://steamsigs.com/steam.php?id=8fprofunk&pngimg=dropshadow&tborder=0.jpg" />

#355 nekoland   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 213
  • Joined: 25-May 07
  • LocationMendoza, Argentina

Posted 17 March 2011 - 3:34 AM

in The Devil Is In The Details, you can hear at 2:22 a Theremin (I think)... Could it be Ed playing his Theremin? Which he got for his birthday :P
Posted Image

(Sorry for my english)

#356 Krisper   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1098
  • Joined: 18-June 09
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 17 March 2011 - 4:03 AM

View PostProbass, on 17 March 2011 - 1:07 PM, said:

Excellent. I've been doing a little programming in C++ for my lab job. I mostly use an OpenGL library called COIN3D to create fairly rudimentary models of various things. I've learned the basics of animation, using engine nodes and whatnot. Then I utilize mostly borrowed code to create CAVElib apps that put it on a 3D VR system.
Otherwise, I've used Java for my basic programming classes. I'm interested in learning C#—
from what I have heard, it is something between C++ and Java. I'm not fond of Java for some reasons, such as it being rather "wordy" when all you want to do is a cout, but at other times I miss using the +operator as concatenation.
I actually started out in webdesign, and I've been wanting to self-teach myself some more javascript. Have you seen the Katamari javascript?
javascript:var i,s,ss=['http://kathack.com/js/kh.js','http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.5.1/jquery.min.js'];for(i=0;i!=ss.length;i++){s=document.createElement('script');s.src=ss[i];document.body.appendChild(s);}void(0);

It is pretty awesome, try injecting it! :smile:


That script is so funny Probass, I destroyed this forum page:-
Posted Image

All of my C++ work has just been console stuff, nothing graphical, apart from playing with DarkGDK which is a C++ game making program. Do you work with CAVE? How awesome. I have been into VR for years, have a few gadgets. Never even seen a CAVE let alone work with one.

The more I learn the more I find that changing languages is not that hard. Once you have a good grounding in any low level language it is pretty easy to pick up a new one. I could chat all day about coding :geek:

Sorry for the off topic stuff.
Further Remixed There's nothing else...

#357 whirlygirl   User is offline

  • dork
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 15302
  • Joined: 06-November 02
  • Locationin the valley of the acid clowns

Posted 17 March 2011 - 4:32 AM

View PostJoslyn, on 16 March 2011 - 9:34 AM, said:

Ok I listened 3 times in a row now to this soundtrack.
If the album is in chronological order (the same order as in the movie itself) I think we've seen the most exciting stuff in the trailer. Probably the movie won't be longer than 100 minutes.
Hanna's theme vocal version seems to be the track for the end credits. Container Park would be the climax/conclusion of the film. Or maybe Container park is the first track for the end credits and Escape Wavefold is the climax movie part.
Most intersting about the soundtrack are all the short soundbites. It seems not only the soundtrack creates the atmosphere in the movie but the sounds THEMSELVES are created by the Chemical Brothers.
IMO the tracks on Hanna are better and create more atmosphere than Daft Punks Tron Legacy soundtrack but that Tron soundtrack is a better album as a whole.
Maybe that's the greatest acomplisment by Tom and Ed, not to create an album as/for themselves but an actual sound for the movie.


I'm inclined to think the music is also in chronological order (doesn't the Hanna's theme vocal version sound like it would be a perfect match for when the credits are rolling?) But I really haven't put too much thought into it. I love this soundtrack but I'm trying so hard not to dissect it too much, or rather, dissect it in terms of how I think it will sound in a movie I haven't seen yet. Since this is a soundtrack and know the premise of the film, it's kind of difficult because I just want to talk about how the music is creating these pictures in my head.

The atmospheric sounds you mention are really intriguing I think - even the tiny bits (like sun collapse) they add so much texture to the songs and feel of the soundtrack. I like those the soft hisses that rise up to the surface of Marissa flashback. The percolating bits (very reminiscent of Harpoons) that are past the 3 minutes mark on interrogation/lonesome subway/Grimm's house triplet. And that haunted isolated howl which sounds almost like a eerie variation of those twinkling music box melodies.

Speaking of variations, there are a lot of recurring themes (understandably). The howl which feels a bit like a cold chill, or a dangerous, unwarranted presence you can't see but you know is there. There's that whistle in Devil Is In The Beats which sounds as though it's carried over from the twinkle melodies. And those twinkling melodies sound like a real music box. You know, like those little trinket holding music boxes that all little girls have that that play fairy tale music... Anyway.

What's fascinating are the plays between dark and light in the soundtrack.

I think the movie is going to be twisted. Can't wait to see it!


View Postnekoland, on 16 March 2011 - 8:34 PM, said:

in The Devil Is In The Details, you can hear at 2:22 a Theremin (I think)... Could it be Ed playing his Theremin? Which he got for his birthday :P


Hmmmmm........ Interesting observation. That would be cool if the theramin was busted out. I want to see that shit live, ha!
be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle

#358 inchemwetrust   User is offline

  • Been Dusted Since 1995
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3569
  • Joined: 11-April 08
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted 17 March 2011 - 6:10 AM

View PostCsar, on 15 March 2011 - 6:41 PM, said:

Erm, is that right what they say in the urban dictionary or rather which one?


it's 2!

View PostWhiteNoise, on 15 March 2011 - 6:12 PM, said:

Posted Image


That's pretty damn good!

View Postmx/, on 15 March 2011 - 7:03 PM, said:

Been listening to this all day...it so damn good! only thing I don't like is the cover + the only digital release format...So I made this to print it on a cardboard sleeve and make my own physical copy for my collection :)

Posted Image


View Postiguanapunk, on 16 March 2011 - 12:37 PM, said:

The main focal point of that image is a horse created by somebody else. You can take credit for drawing on somebody elses artwork, but that is all.


I use to do that alot back in college, but it bit me in the ass later on when it came to jobs. One point for example was going to an interview with my portfolio and immediately the employer found that half of my work wasn't original (even though I created my own interpretation of the original piece)


Anyway, I haven't DL the Hanna OST yet! I'm not a fan of Itunes either. I just go to the Chems myspace for now!
But I will buy it before the movie hits the theaters
Posted Image

#359 BoywiththeGoldenEyes   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4044
  • Joined: 05-November 04
  • LocationSarrebruck

Posted 17 March 2011 - 9:02 AM

View Postiguanapunk, on 16 March 2011 - 8:37 PM, said:

I think if we're going to make comparisons we should stick to the medium of art. If René Magritte took Salvador Dali's melting clocks
Posted Image
and put it into his work, do you think that would be acceptable? There are stock images available to use but with doing so, you must credit the photographer so therefore it is not truly your work.

85%? Where did you come up with this percentage? It's completely erroneous! The main focal point of that image is a horse created by somebody else. You can take credit for drawing on somebody elses artwork, but that is all.

Why on Earth would you have to dress a man in black? You really do not have an imagination do you? You can create orginal art and still stay true to the theme of the album.

This is the trouble now days, everybody has access to an image editing suite such as Photoshop so they think they're an artist by applying a few automatic filters to a piece of somebody elses work.



what the fuck did andy warhol do then with the campbell soup can?

Posted Image

whitenoise is a young lad, he's got some talent and I think it will grow and he'll be getting better and better, also coming up with totally new and own things.

iggy, you're just a miserable cunt, but I mean this in a very nice way.
love is all.

#360 iguanapunk   User is offline

  • Tatsumaki-Senpū kyaku
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9574
  • Joined: 27-February 03
  • Location[-+-]

Posted 17 March 2011 - 1:16 PM

View Postwhirlygirl, on 16 March 2011 - 11:11 PM, said:

Wow there's like 3 different conversations going on in this thread, hahaha. It's like a pub in here!

But I would like to just state my piece here.

In my opinion the lines are easily blurred between borrowing and stealing in terms of artwork. There are as many shades of gray in this area as there are shades of green. There's also fine art, and commercial art.

The Horse Power image that WhiteNoise made is really cool and I like the latin slant and the overall art direction he used. However if push came to shove, and WhiteNoise started making money off his Horse Power image you can bet some tails would be ruffled as far as copyrights are concerned.


Is it really unoriginal to take a piece of artwork and add some personal touches and call it original? I don't know. I don't think that's our call. I don't know if photoshop programs are the trouble, either.

I remember getting into a 'discussion' with another artist when I worked at Tower (when I was doing displays). We needed another person in the art department so I asked this girl who worked behind the register if she was interested. I knew she was going to art school so I thought she'd be the perfect person to ask. But when I did, I basically got lectured with her ridiculous diatribe on how she was a 'real' artist who painted 'real and original' artwork and that basically, what I was doing was pop commercial shit. Even if I was adding my own style and technique, it was still shit because I was basically "copying" album covers, as she put it.

Anyway. Not really sure where I'm going with this. I definitely see where you're coming from but I also see where WN is at, too. I don't think it's entirely fair to imply a lack of originality.


I honestly believe that using somebody elses work in your work means that you have created something that is not original. Sure, you might have an original take on a pre-existing piece but it's not wholly original.

That artist sounds like a dream! Got her number? There may be a place for that kind of art in a record shop but not in a gallery.

I was hoping to hear your opinion on it Whirls ;) And I think it's entirely fair to brand him with that stamp.
Posted Image

  • 44 Pages
  • +
  • « First
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • Last »
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users