Forum
new british single chart system
#1
Posted 19 April 2005 - 9:43 PM
good or bad? okay, it brought galvanize back in chart on #58
but in general - is this the next step in getting rid of the "old" standards CD, vinyl, cassette or does it ban them somewhere in a corner? or can the new system reflect music "sales" in full? should downloads who are available online but not "en realit�" on some medium be counted as well?
waiting for your opinion
#3
Posted 19 April 2005 - 10:16 PM
anType Escribi�:
I think the whole chart sistim should be ELIMINATED! 8O
Yes, you heard me. ELIMINATED !!!!
It will result in singles containing more than 2 tracks :o
well, then not the system -as a big promoter for music- should be eliminated but chart rules }:-@
#5
Posted 20 April 2005 - 5:06 AM
As much as I am old fashioned and fairly resistant to change, and I like the qualities of a tangihble piece of product like music offers, the times they are a'changing. Digital format is the future - just as cd format was the wave that crashed out cassettes and to an extent, vinyl. It has changed everything and will continue to do so. I don't think it's wise for the industry to disregard what people are listening to and downloading on their ipods.
#6
Posted 20 April 2005 - 4:11 PM
the system, as it is now, need to be improved, but counting legal downloads is a first step in the right direction, IMO.
however... i strictly am against charts rules because they only manipulate the charts :x }:-@
#7
Posted 20 April 2005 - 5:36 PM
#8
Posted 20 April 2005 - 5:47 PM
Cassettes sound real shitty to me after the first listen. But they still accounted for sales. cd's sound better than records most of the time - both account for sales. Accounting for mp3's is the next logical step if the industry wants to keep up with the times. We here all like something we can hold in our hands, something that cd's and records offer, some of us like to collect - other people prefer the digital format on their handy ipods. One format shouldn't trump the other, because quality aside, the song remains the same.
#9
Posted 20 April 2005 - 6:51 PM
#10
Posted 20 April 2005 - 6:56 PM
#11
Posted 20 April 2005 - 7:05 PM
Darkstarexodus Escribi�:
I, personally, agree wholeheartedly with you Equinoxe, as I think most people here will. Unfortunately, the vast majority of people elsewhere do not. I mean, if they listen to such crap music anyway (look at the popularity of American/Pop Idol, Britney Spears, most mainstream rap artists right now, etc.), do you think they care about how they get it?
And about this kind of peopples i'am saying. Poor little...creations (not creatures, anyway!) ;-)
#12
Posted 20 April 2005 - 7:19 PM
And, ironically, I'm probably going to buy a portable mp3 player tomorrow so I can listen to music on the bus ride to Coachella.
#16
Posted 21 April 2005 - 4:42 AM
The Chems as well as a ton of other artists take pride in putting together a whole package to deliver their music in. And I admit that's why I've been resisting going totally digital. The package, the substance surrounding the music becomes part of the bigger picture nd thus like equinoxe stated, makes the whole thing that much more intimate. I wish I had more records (and a working record player ;) ) because what I love so much about it isn't just the music, it's the image on the cover and the inner sleeve, the credits, the thank-you's, the lyrics, etc.
There are people out there who think like we do, and people who take pleasure in obtaining the whole package that comes with the music. If the price is low enough, people will gladly fork over the money for a cd. It's just that in the digital age where it's convenient and cheaper to have an ipod or portable mp3 player lying around - not to mention people can pick and choose which songs they want rather than purchase an entire cd - tangible product is in danger of going the way of the dinosaur. Not to mention it's easier and cheaper to distribute music in the digital format. Labels spend hundreds of thousands of dollars each year just to market and advertise and promote their product in stores like the one I work in.
#17
Posted 21 April 2005 - 9:00 AM
#18
Posted 21 April 2005 - 10:02 AM
What happens when I buy a CD is like saying:
- I really like this, and it's really worth paying for it
- I'm glad I'm helping him/her/group/etc
Whirly, I cannot do what you do, I would love to do it, but I just cannot.
Just as an example, last month I went to a shop, saw The Prodigy's Experience, so I grabbed it, when I saw the price... 22US$... sigh...
Currency 1US$ = 26$U
So, no Experience for me. :(
Then I asked if I could import CDs from UK, I thought they would be cheaper, so I asked for an Omni Trio's CD, 24US$... sigh... :(
No CD for me.
I have some CDs that I've already ripped and converted into MP3, I rarely listen to the original CDs, but when I listen to them it's something special.
Another good thing about MP3s is that instead of carrying 10 CDs I can carry 1 CD will all those 10 CDs. ;)
#19
Posted 21 April 2005 - 8:25 PM