Forum
Daft Punk
#3
Posted 28 October 2004 - 6:35 PM
They cant even be arsed to follow up Discovery...its been to long....if you leave something to long, it just gets harder to follow up.
#7
Posted 28 October 2004 - 8:35 PM
#10
Posted 29 October 2004 - 1:07 AM
#11
Posted 29 October 2004 - 1:16 AM
chemicalreaction Escribi�:
I dunno why people expect groundbreaking stuff all the times.
with daft punk i wasn't expecting a ground breaking follow up album. then again i wasn't expecting a dull album either, but thats what i got!!!
the chem have managed to make 3 consecutive ground breaking albums. they always say the third album a band makes is always the hardest. and the chems come along a prove the exception to the rule and deliver the magnificent surrender!!!!
and for the record AONO is shit!!!
#13
Posted 29 October 2004 - 1:37 AM
chemicalreaction Escribi�:
difference of opinion. Can't argue with that. and c'mon discovery wasn't that bad and AONO is funky man!!!
well i cant say your opinion is wrong and mine is right. but to me discovery is bad. and i get more pleasure out of white noise than i do from AONO!!
#14
Posted 29 October 2004 - 1:46 AM
Everytime i listen to the Alive 1997 set im blown away.
but not forgetting that was a good 7 years ago.
These days daft punk are infact, boring, and more interested in being "cutting edge" (ala interstellar 5555, and recently designing a coffee table for some company) than being good artists for the fans.
as for the remix of take me out, hated it at first, and i realise its the fucking laziest remix anyone has ever done ever, but i have to admit, heard fatboy slim play it recently and it was superb, only because the original is.
AONO really is rubbish. like a lot of albums im hearing lately (palookaville especially) there seems to be a whole lot of run of the mill stuff and a few good tracks, not wall to wall class with some exceptional moments (as with the chems)
Discovery has its moments, not a patch on homework but its nothing like homework, its more nice music to listen to whereas Homework is at home in the club.
Id seriously chop off my little finger to have the new chems album now. i just dont know how im going to last. id say this is the only album ive eagerly awaited in a long long time.
#15
Posted 29 October 2004 - 1:57 AM
Fatman88 Escribi�:
Id seriously chop off my little finger to have the new chems album now. i just dont know how im going to last. id say this is the only album ive eagerly awaited in a long long time.
thats cos you know its not going to be run of the mill!!! best things come to those who wait!!!
#16
Posted 29 October 2004 - 1:59 AM
As far as Plookaville goes i am very dissapointed with Norman. Same old technique, same style (which is ok but it is getting very predictable ) Chems on the other hand... are a whole different story.
And sneaker how can you say "record AONO is shit" it is not. Tracks like Spitfire, More Girls and Hotride are totally rockin. I agree as an album AONO isn't even close to TFOL, Music for... but individual tracks are pretty decent.
#19
Posted 29 October 2004 - 3:28 AM
Gotta say I agree with sneaker on the Daft/AONO critiques. N'uff said.
chemicalreaction, you brought up a good point about people expecting each successive record from an artist to be groundbreaking, or better than the one before. I think it just boils down to this: when it comes to artists who've blown you away or really pushed the envelope the first time, you expect nothing less than the best each and every time thereafter. It's very easy to create these visions of grandeur when you anticipate a new record from an artist you highly regard. And when you've come to hear anything short of spectacular from your favorite artist... well, you know, it can be a big let down because then you've got to admit it and move on.
We are very spoiled with the Chemical Brothers because they have delivered each and every time. This is quite a feat... it's hard to pack a punch every time and at the end of the day, not have a weak link somewhere in the catalogue. No pressure on Tom and Ed!!! ;)
#20
Posted 29 October 2004 - 3:45 AM