Lauren Laverne played it as one of her last songs on her show today.
Forum
Daft Punk New Album?
#121
- K+D+B
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: 01-June 07
- LocationCGN CTY
Posted 19 April 2013 - 1:37 PM
MultiQuote
#122
- Brother
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 554
- Joined: 25-November 07
Posted 19 April 2013 - 2:25 PM
Eis-T, on 19 April 2013 - 2:46 PM, said:
my internets is full of fakes, can someone post a soundcloud or youtube link to the real deal?
so far i quite like what i hear. some great remixes and bootlegs of that 15 second sample!
so far i quite like what i hear. some great remixes and bootlegs of that 15 second sample!
http://www.audiomack...szone/get-lucky
#123
- Brother
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 966
- Joined: 23-April 03
Posted 19 April 2013 - 3:20 PM
I don't like Get Lucky very much. Has to be the most over-hyped disco track ever. If this was released under a different arist moniker, people wouldn't even give this track much attention. It's 70ish disco with Pharrell singing over it...and then some vocoder/autotune vocals thrown in. It honestly sounds like something I hear while at the dentist. Really hoping the rest of the album is not like this at all.
#124
- Brother
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 483
- Joined: 31-August 08
Posted 19 April 2013 - 4:27 PM
Quote
This song has been removed and is no longer available.
just 30 mins to late
found it on youtube:
i keep on agreeing with White Noise: not the most exciting track and the most unofficial takes on this track offer more awesomeness. (as a huge fan of filterhouse that 15 second sample in endless loop with different effects does the trick for me
)
Extended versions of your favourite Chemical Brothers tracks: https://soundcloud.com/cb_extended
#125
- Did ya synth just burp?
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4504
- Joined: 14-February 04
- LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind
Posted 19 April 2013 - 4:56 PM
WhiteNoise, on 19 April 2013 - 9:40 AM, said:
Spoiler
And yet again, you know it's Daft Punk. Loops, loops, loops, and fruity loops. Easy to digest, nothing to worry about, but the same menue endlessly repeating itself.
This is not a burst generator, it's a mere cash generator. A listenable one, though, except for the cheesy Pharrell delivery. Pooo, this sounds so poppy and mainstream.
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²
#126
- K+D+B
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: 01-June 07
- LocationCGN CTY
Posted 19 April 2013 - 5:16 PM
#127
- Veteran
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 7269
- Joined: 05-November 02
Posted 19 April 2013 - 7:21 PM
Exactly its a radio edit, don't be so quick to judge. It's like judging an entire movie based on a teaser trailer of 15 seconds. We don't know how the song fits in with the rest of the album and at which part it is played. They could have released 8 minute of acid mind fuck but that won't get much air play. The point now is to get a new fans and listerners to buy the album because die hard fans and just regular fans will buy the album regardless. Even if its endless fruity loops all throughout. You can't deny that the track is actually funky as hell and would get a lot of club play.
#128
- Did ya synth just burp?
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4504
- Joined: 14-February 04
- LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind
Posted 19 April 2013 - 8:29 PM
chemicalreaction, on 19 April 2013 - 9:21 PM, said:
Exactly its a radio edit, don't be so quick to judge. It's like judging an entire movie based on a teaser trailer of 15 seconds. We don't know how the song fits in with the rest of the album and at which part it is played. They could have released 8 minute of acid mind fuck but that won't get much air play. The point now is to get a new fans and listerners to buy the album because die hard fans and just regular fans will buy the album regardless. Even if its endless fruity loops all throughout. You can't deny that the track is actually funky as hell and would get a lot of club play.
No no, you got me all wrong. This particular track is downright good, or let's say its premise is pretty cool. But they don't really elaborate on that loop. It comes right in, nothing really happens throughout, except for the nice vocoder action, and then it's over. It's damn funky, alright, and it really gets you moving. So far I like it. But for me it lacks a good song structre, a little build-up, peak and so forth. Even the brothers managed to do that with a less than 3 minute Another World radio edit. That's what has been bugging me about the Daft duo all along. You have great riff, a catchy loop, now go do something with it!
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²
#129
- Veteran
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: 30-May 05
Posted 20 April 2013 - 3:02 AM
This:
tom_rowlands_chemical_chi, on 08 January 2003 - 8:53 PM, said:
This old man,
he play beats,
He don't need no music sheets,
but with a snip-snip-snippy-snip
gave his mop a chop,
Old man hairstyles are a flop.
he play beats,
He don't need no music sheets,
but with a snip-snip-snippy-snip
gave his mop a chop,
Old man hairstyles are a flop.
#130
- Brother
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 237
- Joined: 31-May 07
Posted 20 April 2013 - 5:45 PM
I really like the track, its poppy yeah but its got summer written all over it. I think there is something to be said for not over complicating a good groove. Its worked before for them, i think the Tron soundtrack was something they worked on a lot and did research and really poured over it and that turned out shit, I just hope they havent over done it here
Reading and listening to all the stuff about this album being musician heavy and a reaction tall the EDM button pushing by numbers merchants out there is commendable but i dont necessarily think they had to that. I dont ever think the brothers react to whats out there, they just do what feels like. Further is quite "real" sounding but i dont think they did that because of other bands out there. I think Daft Punk could have done a more traditional daft punk album to show some of these poor quality EDM acts how its really done.
Anyway i have heard one single so not going to judge yet and from what i have heard its essentially a pharrell track anyway.
I have to say the way the anticipation has been built is first class.
Reading and listening to all the stuff about this album being musician heavy and a reaction tall the EDM button pushing by numbers merchants out there is commendable but i dont necessarily think they had to that. I dont ever think the brothers react to whats out there, they just do what feels like. Further is quite "real" sounding but i dont think they did that because of other bands out there. I think Daft Punk could have done a more traditional daft punk album to show some of these poor quality EDM acts how its really done.
Anyway i have heard one single so not going to judge yet and from what i have heard its essentially a pharrell track anyway.
I have to say the way the anticipation has been built is first class.
#131
- Brother
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 483
- Joined: 31-August 08
Posted 20 April 2013 - 6:11 PM
after a few listens (at least 10 times) i think i know what this track is missing: there is no break/bridge! Like in One More Time there is that wonderful moment Moroder described. A moment where the whole track is tripped down and gradually gets build up again. that is what I'm missing. They should have done some filter magic an give Rogers a guitar solo in the middle with a buildup to the last chorus where the awesome loop kicks in again.
Edit: i think i mean the precisely the same as Csar
Edit: i think i mean the precisely the same as Csar
Extended versions of your favourite Chemical Brothers tracks: https://soundcloud.com/cb_extended
#132
- Hmm... I was confused.
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2230
- Joined: 28-November 09
- LocationPurdue University
Posted 20 April 2013 - 6:15 PM
Bosco, on 19 April 2013 - 10:02 PM, said:
This:
Now that's Daft Punk! I knew that 4 minute version was a fake.
EDIT:
Okay, wow. For everyone who thought this track wasn't repetitive enough, here's eleven minutes of Pharell singing over the radio edit of the song, with the vocals left on it, three times in a row:
SAVE FERRIS FORUM
#133
- Veteran
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: 18-June 09
- LocationAustralia
Posted 21 April 2013 - 1:25 AM
I was trying not to comment any more on this, I really don't know enough to make any valid arguments, but I lived through the whole "disco" era, and I was sort of hoping that it was left back there. A bit of a "disco" influence certainly can have a place in modern music, but this track, the guitar rift, vocal etc bores me to tears. Am I alone in feeling this way?
Further Remixed There's nothing else...
#134
- Been Dusted Since 1995
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3569
- Joined: 11-April 08
- LocationLos Angeles
Posted 21 April 2013 - 8:55 PM
Krisper, on 20 April 2013 - 6:25 PM, said:
but I lived through the whole "disco" era, and I was sort of hoping that it was left back there
But then the kids go through your things without you knowing and look now...'get lucky' gets played in the market.
BTW....Big Beat music said it will be back in 2027!
#135
- Brother
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 367
- Joined: 15-January 03
- LocationMelbourne, Australia
Posted 23 April 2013 - 11:27 AM
I'm sure I read in there recent interview that theres only one sample (from an aussie rock band in last track) most likely AC/DC again. And hardly used a drum machine (only like on 2 tracks?) They did say that not everyone will be happy with it either....There trying something new and trying to grow it seems taking on what they've learnt from past albums and felt restraint from looping things. (in there words) (I think the interview was with Rolling Stone)
Come out from the cold and into the setting sun. It's where it all began for me (not in Afrika), like it was out of control. Then after that life was sweet. So dream on into the pioneer skies of the fourteenth century and rise from the sunshine underground.
#136
- Brother
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 483
- Joined: 31-August 08
Posted 23 April 2013 - 11:44 AM
inchemwetrust, on 21 April 2013 - 10:55 PM, said:
BTW....Big Beat music said it will be back in 2027!
Nice! I'll be there to teach the, yet to be born, punks what the "real Big Beat" was like.
more on topic: do you guys also keep going back to listening the remixes of the previous released loops instead of listening to the radio edit?
Extended versions of your favourite Chemical Brothers tracks: https://soundcloud.com/cb_extended
#137
- Been Dusted Since 1995
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3569
- Joined: 11-April 08
- LocationLos Angeles
Posted 23 April 2013 - 7:41 PM
Haven't really listened to the loops, but I finally listened to 'lucky' in it's entirety and even though I don't prefer Pharell singing, it's a good quality track, but not contagiously good!
#139
- I'm (Probably) In A Good Mood!
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1813
- Joined: 06-February 11
- LocationWherever you want me to be, man...
Posted 23 April 2013 - 11:06 PM
mikl, on 23 April 2013 - 7:27 AM, said:
I'm sure I read in there recent interview that theres only one sample (from an aussie rock band in last track) most likely AC/DC again.
*ahem*
Champiness, on 30 March 2013 - 7:27 PM, said:
Also, the latest scoop from The Daft Club is that this song might be the only sample on the record. If so, don't forget that you heard it from Champi first!
And don't go forgetting again!
"Contact" should be awesome (apparently it'll be a fleshed-out version of what Thomas and Falcon are playing here).
charanku, on 29 March 2013 - 2:58 PM, said:
yes he is dancing but .............
#140
- Brother
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 367
- Joined: 15-January 03
- LocationMelbourne, Australia
Posted 25 April 2013 - 11:40 AM
Champiness, on 24 April 2013 - 10:06 AM, said:
*ahem*And don't go forgetting again!"Contact" should be awesome (apparently it'll be a fleshed-out version of what Thomas and Falcon are playing here).
Come out from the cold and into the setting sun. It's where it all began for me (not in Afrika), like it was out of control. Then after that life was sweet. So dream on into the pioneer skies of the fourteenth century and rise from the sunshine underground.