TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers: CHEWY CHOCOLATE COOKIES Rmx & replies : ) - TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers

Jump to content

home

Forum

CHEWY CHOCOLATE COOKIES Rmx & replies : )

Page 1 of 1
  • This topic is locked

#1 CHEWYCHOCOLATECOOKIES

  • Group: Guests

Posted 02 May 2007 - 4:04 PM

Hey guys,


check out


CHEMICAL BROTHERS "Do it again"

CHEWY CHOCOLATE COOKIES Rmx


simply an "hommage" to

CHEWY CHOCOLATE COOKIES favourite artists


http://www.myspace.c...hocolatecookies


CHEWY CHOCOLATE COOKIES

feel great without getting fat!


AND ALSO.....REPLY TO YOUR POSTS……..


chemicalreaction *enjoyed -----------THANKS !!!!


MadPooter **also enjoyed, immensely so---------- MANY THANKS!!!!!!


mippio that really was awful. the start of the tune, which was bad, had no relation to the chems bit that came in half way through. sorry. ------------------- THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENT, BUT I HAVE TO SAY THAT I DON’T THINK IT’S AWFUL….I THINK IT’S A GREAT RMX, NOT ONLY BECAUSE I DID IT, BUT ALSO BECAUSE I DON’T HAVE THE ORIGINAL PARTS, IT’S A “CUT&PASTE “ OF THE ORIGINAL TRACK…ANYWAY, I ACCEPT YOUR OPINION….I READ SOMEWHERE THAT, AT THE BEGINNING SOMEONE SAID NO TO THE BEATLES AS WELL…


MadPooter "the start of the tune, which was bad, had no relation to the chems bit that came in half way through." So? -----------------RIGHT , RIGHT & RIGHT…..MUSIC IT’S NOT MATHEMATICS….I DID IT BECAUSE IT LIKE THAT…AND THAT’S IT…..ANYWAY, THANKS MADPOOTER


mxI like it. ---------------THANKS “”””


MadPooter I thought it was surprisingly fierce--the way the hard synth line from the original track was cut and looped was awesome.----------------------THANKS, THANKS & THANKS !!!!!!


Irishfan bit shit tbh------------------- IS IT A GOOD THING OR A BAD THING?


ACIDCHILDREN Total rubbish! -----------------WHY? EXPLAIN PLEASE 


MadPooterOkay okay okay, fine fine. I still liked the tune----------------------THANKS, AGAIN!!!


mx Oh come on! at least tell him why you dont like it.--------------------------RIGHT !!!!!! IT COULD BE USEFULL FOR MY NEXT RMX


SlipvinNot bad at all, but mine would be better. That Cool Edit slowdown at the end sucked ass btw. ----------------------THANKS !!!!! BUT NOW I’M CURIOUS……LET ME HEAR YOURS !!!!!


Csar If it was not linked with the brothers it would sound good. The melody is quite catchy in my eyes. But I hate this trancy synth, bua ---------------------SORRY MATE, BUT THAT TRANCY SYNTH IS AT THE END OF THE ORIGINAL TRACK, I JUST FILTERED IT……….SO, ARE YOU SAYING THAT YOU HATE THE ORIGINAL TRACK ????


Prochem nice remix of a nice song ----------------------THANKS!!!!!!!


Biff party like it's 1999... Sounds a bit old school or out dated tranceish. Think that 2 minute part was pretty fucking awesome regarding the heavy reverb and echo fading to the simple beat. They sounds good just not one of those people you would remixing the chems if your a chems fan. Plus the lyrics seem out of harmony ----------------------THANKS FOR THE “FUCKING AWESOME” !!!!!


THANKS


CHEWY CHOCOLATE COOKIES

feel great without getting fat!




#2 Profunk

  • Group: Guests

Posted 02 May 2007 - 4:15 PM

I liked the CCC remix, probably more than the official Hunteman one, which I think takes WAY too long to build up, and is truly "Minimal" in the sense that its less complicated than the original mix.


Hey Chewy Chocolate Cookies, check my Shoes remix at http://www.myspace.com/djprofunk2




#3 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4504
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 02 May 2007 - 4:22 PM

All I mean is I don't like the synth. I believe if you're omitting it, it will sound hundred times better than now. That is to say it's got a very epic style regarding the build-up and melody. These are the main elements I like about this remix. Well, as a stand-alone track it would be ace.



E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#4 Slipvin   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2505
  • Joined: 18-January 05

Posted 02 May 2007 - 7:34 PM

Who is this cookie cutter anyway?




#5 Biff   User is offline

  • Random Noise Generator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3130
  • Joined: 01-November 02
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 02 May 2007 - 7:49 PM

Yeah Profunk, that hunsman remix is my definition of minimal, kinda like the h-foundation remix of CWU.




#6 MadPooter   User is offline

  • Spritual lifter
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4352
  • Joined: 03-May 05
  • LocationSan Francisco, CA

Posted 02 May 2007 - 7:54 PM

Wow... feedback on feedback. Pretty awesome. :)




#7 prochem   User is offline

  • Accelerator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3037
  • Joined: 30-March 07
  • LocationTORONTO

Posted 02 May 2007 - 8:53 PM

lol, h-foundation! i remember the h-foundation bashing a long time ago ;)



Electronizkez Van Attacko
Posted Image

#8 Jeanie   User is offline

  • JeanieBeanie!
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7883
  • Joined: 01-March 04
  • LocationAmsterdam

Posted 02 May 2007 - 9:07 PM

Hey here we have sombody who can handle some critism!


My opinion on thr track - i think you should cut the first part , the trancey part , off and make a whole different tune out of it. Its sounds really good but i dont think it works as a intro for this tune.


As for the rest of the tune - it works well in a 'waters of nazareth" kind of way. I am not a big justice fan , but i can see how his cut-up beats could work in youre remix.


So , cut off the first part and make a whole different tune out fo it.


Make the funky distorted part that starts after that even more cut-up , wrong and twisted , and you will have

1) a wicked remix

2) a good tune.


Overal , i think its pretty good.

Actually i am quite impressed.

Ive heard faaaaaar worse remixes of songs.

Well done cookie!




#9 Jeanie   User is offline

  • JeanieBeanie!
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7883
  • Joined: 01-March 04
  • LocationAmsterdam

Posted 02 May 2007 - 9:17 PM

Yeah i listened to it again and i think the part from 00.00 till 02.00 should be removed and made into a whole different tune !! Seriously it has potential. A bit to trancey for my likings , but thats not a bad thing.


The distirted twisted part is what you should focus on! Make it fucked up and cut -up! And Twisted! And a bit wrong! Than u will take all out of this remix.


Really it has muchos potential. I think its very good.


BUT you HAVE to get rid of those drumrolls at the end of the trancy bit. AT 2 mins in.


Okay i'm done :p




#10 Slipvin   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2505
  • Joined: 18-January 05

Posted 02 May 2007 - 10:12 PM

Who's the hot chick in the pic?




#11 Profunk

  • Group: Guests

Posted 02 May 2007 - 10:23 PM

xD Haha, I'm not sure if thats a diss or he really doesn't know




#12 prochem   User is offline

  • Accelerator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3037
  • Joined: 30-March 07
  • LocationTORONTO

Posted 03 May 2007 - 2:47 AM

lol XD x100



Electronizkez Van Attacko
Posted Image

Page 1 of 1
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users