TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers: 9 Songs - TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers

Jump to content

home

Forum

9 Songs

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot reply to this topic

#1 makeskidskill

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 September 2007 - 8:36 PM

this is a little flick about an English glaciologist and a random american girl who meet at a Black Rebel Motorcycle Club gig at the Brixton Academy.... the movie is just about their relationship, and their relationship consists mainly of fucking and going to gigs. 9 of em. So all the gigs are real, Primal Scream, Dandy Warhols, Superfurry Animals, etc... and all the sex is real.


basicly, it's like a porno, but with live performances by Primal Scream.


you should see it




#2 chemicalreaction   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 21 September 2007 - 8:51 PM

lol, i will. But I hope the is porn is just as engaging as the live perfomances.




#3 prochem   User is offline

  • Accelerator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3037
  • Joined: 30-March 07
  • LocationTORONTO

Posted 21 September 2007 - 9:44 PM

haha! sounds cool



Electronizkez Van Attacko
Posted Image

#4 whirly

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 September 2007 - 11:09 PM

It's not really porn in that it's dolled up with overly beautiful people, fancy camera angles and uncomfortable "porn positions". I do enjoy porn from time to time (confessions confessions!) but let's face it - it's hardly like real life because in porn, the way in which people are positioned are for the camera's advantage and nothing more. try some of those positions in real life and you'll either end up with a permanant kink in your neck, or in the porn industry with a chiropractor on the set at all times. Or maybe I'm just not that limber. heh. Anyway, 9 Songs is sexually explicit without being grotesque or being full blown porn - for example, they show the pink as well as full frontal male nudity, the money shot and a fair amount of light kink. People are having sex in the film, and it's raw and realistic. But there's not much story other than it chronicles a couple's sexual relationship from beginning to end. But in reality, a lot of relatioships are that way - so, not much else to say on that matter. I wouldn't particularly say the movie is fantastic, but it is forward thinking in terms of sexuality in a fairly mainstream flick by a fairly well respected director (Michael Winterbottom).


Oh, and the music in 9 Songs is loads better than that boom-chikka-ba-wah crap they play in porn. Come on! :lol:




#5 makeskidskill

  • Group: Guests

Posted 22 September 2007 - 1:33 AM

I wish I knew video editing, cuz I'd recut the flick so all the live shows were clips of the Chems... that would be funny as hell.




#6 whirly

  • Group: Guests

Posted 22 September 2007 - 4:00 AM

^^ :lol: Yeah - I think we need to have our brother-in-law put his Mac to good use and do some clever editing. Chems gig cuts to the 2 main characters in the audience, cuts back to the Chems then cuts to the 2 main characters getting it on. Naughty!




#7 TJtheDJ007

  • Group: Guests

Posted 22 September 2007 - 4:48 AM

nothin could get better than that. haha




#8 Jeanie   User is offline

  • JeanieBeanie!
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7883
  • Joined: 01-March 04
  • LocationAmsterdam

Posted 22 September 2007 - 9:49 AM

Yeh ive seen this movie and its wicked.


I dont mind a bit of porn myself ( Hey if were doing confessions anyway i migth aswell ad my 2 cents !! ) but this movie is actually beautifull. The guy and girl are very well cast ( She's actually a model and he's an actor, it took them ages to find people who were willing to do what they do on camera ) and the film is just very,very realistic. This is how many relationships are, it doesnt make it more beautifull than it actually is, the beauty of this film is in its rawness and pureness.


Def a reccomendation BUT don't watch it if your a bit shy cause it's pretty full on, i mean REALLY full on.




#9 AuricGoldfinger

  • Group: Guests

Posted 22 September 2007 - 10:52 AM

I think the film is older than 3years.Its a little bit short.But the music is very good and margot stilley is very cute.

And i think the director want to do a controverse film with explicit scenes.And this is the only thing i dont like in this kind of films.Fucking to get publicity. (like brown bunny,romancexxx,etc....)

greets




#10 chemdup

  • Group: Guests

Posted 22 September 2007 - 4:25 PM

the performances are good....


but if a girl was ever giving me head then jacked me off onto MY OWN stomach.....she wouldn't get past seeing one song with me let alone 9......




#11 AuricGoldfinger

  • Group: Guests

Posted 22 September 2007 - 6:39 PM

And dont understand,why the director cut all the great performances.the Film is only 70 minutes long with all these cutting.Perhaps there will be a directors cut.Ok,the song performances equales the fucking scenes.




#12 Bosco   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4585
  • Joined: 30-May 05

Posted 22 September 2007 - 7:05 PM

"I wish I knew video editing, cuz I'd recut the flick so all the live shows were clips of the Chems... that would be funny as hell."


Well, instead of editing the film we could just do a new film of our own. Just gotta make sure are new chemical couple are "game"...



View Posttom_rowlands_chemical_chi, on 08 January 2003 - 8:53 PM, said:

This old man,
he play beats,
He don't need no music sheets,
but with a snip-snip-snippy-snip
gave his mop a chop,
Old man hairstyles are a flop.

#13 whirly

  • Group: Guests

Posted 22 September 2007 - 7:56 PM

naughty naughty! :lol:




#14 Sethful

  • Group: Guests

Posted 26 September 2007 - 9:28 PM

okay... I took y'all's advice and watched this film.

I knew going in there was going to be some nudity... but ya didn't tell me the extent!!

Some of the music was okay.... the acting was alright, plot was well, pretty much non existent.


I wasn't sure if it was a bad porn with a bit of a plot line, or if it was an alright movie with a bad plot with a bunch of porn.




#15 whirly

  • Group: Guests

Posted 26 September 2007 - 10:35 PM

^ But do you agree it would be funny if the music/live footage was replaced with the Chemical Brothers? :lol:




#16 Sethful

  • Group: Guests

Posted 26 September 2007 - 11:20 PM

it would be hilarious. and would have a pretty damn good porn soundtrack.




#17 Slipvin   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2505
  • Joined: 18-January 05

Posted 26 September 2007 - 11:45 PM

Michael Winterbottom is an underrated director. He also did 24 Hour Party People and The Road To Guantanamo. And this ain't a porn flick at all.




#18 nalaknip   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 390
  • Joined: 16-February 05

Posted 27 September 2007 - 8:36 PM

The guy in it was Fitz's son in Cracker. And is anyone old enough to remember that kids show Gruey? That was him as well. Its hard to watch someone you grew up watching as a kid getting whacked off on a bed. Winterbottom is a great director though.




#19 AuricGoldfinger

  • Group: Guests

Posted 29 September 2007 - 10:17 AM

Is the next part of the film called 9 Inches??




Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users