Forum
listen to the golden path!!!
#42
Posted 22 July 2003 - 11:36 PM
you're a mug mate
if you love a band you go with them where they go
learn to love music not catalogue numbers and track running times..
the golden path is an unbelievable piece of music..do they have to make the same record again and again for you to be happy..
if you ever saw them dejay you'd know the acid is still strong
go with it -> (!) (!) (!)
if you love a band you go with them where they go
learn to love music not catalogue numbers and track running times..
the golden path is an unbelievable piece of music..do they have to make the same record again and again for you to be happy..
if you ever saw them dejay you'd know the acid is still strong
go with it -> (!) (!) (!)
#43
Posted 23 July 2003 - 12:04 AM
[quote name="master p's crib"]do they have to make the same record again and again for you to be happy..
quote]
Agreed with you here. If the Chems kept making Dig Your Own Hole, there'd be complaints that they were rehashing old ideas and recycling their old ways.
I'd much rather the Chems take chances than stagnate. Sometimes it works, sometimes you end up alienating your older fans who are set in their ways. In the end if they are making the music they want to make, if they are happy with the finished product, that's what matters.
quote]
Agreed with you here. If the Chems kept making Dig Your Own Hole, there'd be complaints that they were rehashing old ideas and recycling their old ways.
I'd much rather the Chems take chances than stagnate. Sometimes it works, sometimes you end up alienating your older fans who are set in their ways. In the end if they are making the music they want to make, if they are happy with the finished product, that's what matters.
be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle
#45
Posted 23 July 2003 - 4:01 AM
I could not disagree to a fuller extent even if i tried. I got the singles yesterday and was able to hear the full version and must say anyone who has judged this song off of that 59 sec sample has been the subject of false impression. The sample was taken from the end of the radio edit. I wasn't too excited when I broke in and listened to it. But the rest the song is funny, a lot of it is spoken word like something from a live frank zappa concert. He talkings about how he saw the devil and his voice was this fire lava thing from from a volcano ... okay cannot remember the lyrics exact yet, but while he's talking about the firey voice they have this happy flute playing in the background which gives it hilarious contrast. On cd his voice doesn't sound as much like bono during the course because the high frequency is picked up better, and doesn't sound "gay" or whatever term you kids like to use. All in all I'm just saying the song is an upbeat funny but not stupid-funny track and that once you hear it the way it should be most of you will like it more. I believe my first post on the board was back when they had the bootleg copies of cwu on the net and how everyone was dissing on it, and to my recollection, people like it more now...
If the chems stopped trying new stuff after DYOH they wouldn't be my favorite band, the thing I enjoy the most about them is they always go in a new direction and never stop progressing with new ideas. As for get yourself high, it is much more reminiscent on the chems earlier work like the original version of hey boy hey girl (way more layers though) and is full of analog sounds and compared to not another drugstore, this one isn't covered in lyrics, it's well balanced and I think for most the people stuck on more familiar stuff that this will come off better at start with everyone.
If the chems stopped trying new stuff after DYOH they wouldn't be my favorite band, the thing I enjoy the most about them is they always go in a new direction and never stop progressing with new ideas. As for get yourself high, it is much more reminiscent on the chems earlier work like the original version of hey boy hey girl (way more layers though) and is full of analog sounds and compared to not another drugstore, this one isn't covered in lyrics, it's well balanced and I think for most the people stuck on more familiar stuff that this will come off better at start with everyone.
#47
Posted 23 July 2003 - 8:56 AM
I think that everybody needs to chill.
I can feel a lot of anger below the surface.(yoke)
Now more serious:
Lets make one thing clear (!)
If the Chems never tried new things with music.
Their music woudn't exist at all.
On the first album and all that followed they pust the musical boundaries.
And I think that is a good thing.
As for the older fans (myself included) need to grow into the new songs.
That is not because we don't like it but this is because our musical progression goes not so fast as that of the Chemical brothers.
I can feel a lot of anger below the surface.(yoke)
Now more serious:
Lets make one thing clear (!)
If the Chems never tried new things with music.
Their music woudn't exist at all.
On the first album and all that followed they pust the musical boundaries.
And I think that is a good thing.
As for the older fans (myself included) need to grow into the new songs.
That is not because we don't like it but this is because our musical progression goes not so fast as that of the Chemical brothers.
#50
Posted 23 July 2003 - 1:54 PM
Biff Escribi�:
He talkings about how he saw the devil and his voice was this fire lava thing from from a volcano ... okay cannot remember the lyrics exact yet, but while he's talking about the firey voice they have this happy flute playing in the background which gives it hilarious contrast.
Reminds me alot of Tenacious D. - "Tribute" X-D
#54
Posted 23 July 2003 - 6:58 PM
anType posted:
So if you like the production on the track why are you criticising the chems?
I like the track, haven't heard the full version yet. I am not criticising anType for not likeing the track, although it does annoy me when he accuses the chems of making pop music.
I just hate the vocals, not the instrumental part
So if you like the production on the track why are you criticising the chems?
I like the track, haven't heard the full version yet. I am not criticising anType for not likeing the track, although it does annoy me when he accuses the chems of making pop music.
#57 chemdup
Posted 24 July 2003 - 12:53 AM
the "track" is great,well what ive heard of it, but i HATE that prick from the lips with a fu*king passion. the nail was hit on the head earlier,it sounds like tenacious D "tribute" and they are THE SH!TEST "BAND" IN THE WORLD. it was a record label thing putting that wanker on the track,they have a new album out.......so do the chems....hey lets hook them up..........NO F*CK OFF the flaming lips new album is sh!te and wayne coyne is a c*nt. I FUCKING HATE HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i am actually so so so angry with this track,and to a part the chems.
spoken word bollox
great beats,a good track except for.................well im sure you can guess who! it is just up its own arse arrogance doing "spoken word" ball juice. anyone who blindly likes this track cause its by the chems is stupid,look at the glaring facts of the crapness of coyne in it.
coyne;piss off to jack black and make your sh!te with him you prick
i am actually so so so angry with this track,and to a part the chems.
spoken word bollox
great beats,a good track except for.................well im sure you can guess who! it is just up its own arse arrogance doing "spoken word" ball juice. anyone who blindly likes this track cause its by the chems is stupid,look at the glaring facts of the crapness of coyne in it.
coyne;piss off to jack black and make your sh!te with him you prick
#58
Posted 24 July 2003 - 2:22 AM
I don't think the guys from flaming lips are bad, yoshimi is a great album and the wanker thing is just getting carried away... what did the band slash your tires or something? You think they are pricks, well didn't the chems work with both Noel G and Richard A?