Forum
Daft Punk
#161
Posted 29 May 2006 - 8:16 AM
Re Britney Spears (the music I mean hehe) as long as its not one of those awful piano-stab Oops I did it again-style tracks then I'm cool with that.
#162
Posted 29 May 2006 - 5:00 PM
Jeanie : but ffs , if people like that cd , they like it. What's the fucking problem.
awesome, that's what i wanted to say, also.
but basically, i dunno, i hated this album when i played it first, but i quite like it now once in a blue moon, i love their total back to basics, and very very basic songwriting and instrumentation approach. it's exactly like darkstar said, they don't give a fuck, they just wanted to do something stupid. and it's still good. not trippy, not psychedelic, just a few basic machines put to good use.
i hope they come off and blow the bollocks off all the "expectations" people. guys, while u were ramblin on over something stupid.. here's..
... somethin more stupid! :D
and whirly, u always make sense. we need some energy in u.
#165
Posted 29 May 2006 - 5:59 PM
i think eamons 'i dont want you back' was one of the best pop records of last year :-//
i also think girls aloud first single 'sound of the underground' was awesome.
im gonna remix beautifull by christina aguelira, BECAUSE it rocks, it just needs a dusty hip hop beat.
:-//
(daft punk are still poo ;))
#169
Posted 29 May 2006 - 6:56 PM
mippio Escribi�:
i think the point everyone is missing is that after homework, everything that daft punk did simply wasnt very good.
;)
hefuckinhe. i think we've had this discussion too many times. there are u'r kinda people, and there are my kinda "very few" people. darn.
i think discovery fuckin rocks. so what if it's not "hardcore" enough for u'r old school fans.
i love it for the connections it has for me.
darn, don't people really get that simple little funda, or is it just all fun? :D
#170
Posted 29 May 2006 - 6:58 PM
ACIDCHILDREN Escribi�:
I wonder if i go the the daft site if i can fine some chems threads?
hahahaha! THE post of the night!!!
hahahaha!
no wonder we're called chems fans. we're fuckin superior. :D :D :D
#171
Posted 29 May 2006 - 7:07 PM
Ben_j Escribi�:
I think HAA was made to be heard in a live mash up. As an album, it's a pretty bad album, but in their live, it sounds great !
I think you're on to something. When I heard Human After All the first time it sounded like it was made more to play within a mix. With it's minimal, repetitive approach it may be hard for some people to swallow by itself as an album, but it could work as one of the ingredients thrown into a dj set.
And Jack's Revenge thank you for the nice words. :)
#172
Posted 29 May 2006 - 7:44 PM
JacksRevenge Escribi�:
mippio Escribi�:
i think the point everyone is missing is that after homework, everything that daft punk did simply wasnt very good.
;)
hefuckinhe. i think we've had this discussion too many times. there are u'r kinda people, and there are my kinda "very few" people. darn.
i think discovery fuckin rocks. so what if it's not "hardcore" enough for u'r old school fans.
i love it for the connections it has for me.
darn, don't people really get that simple little funda, or is it just all fun? :D
haha, yeh man i dont care really im just on the wind up. each to their own and all that. leaves more 'proper' music for us real men ;) :P
#173
Posted 29 May 2006 - 7:52 PM
np : homework, i'm gonna dance my ass off alone and think of you.
hahaha.
yes, to each of his own! :D
p.s. sure, this is hardcore. i hope my balls fall off now, or it's no pt wastin my hard earned dosh on this whole bottle of rum.
back to my homework.
whirly : u'r the woman, u know.
like we used to have a "THE woman" back on the strato forums a long time back, 'browneyedgirl', i miss that forum, dammit.
#174
Posted 29 May 2006 - 8:53 PM
Ben_j Escribi�:
I think HAA was made to be heard in a live mash up. As an album, it's a pretty bad album, but in their live, it sounds great !
bingo!....right on Ben J
#175
Posted 29 May 2006 - 9:49 PM
guess they'r destined to be the meat beat manifesto of electronic music with this album. hehe, nevermind, if it didn't make sense.
#176
Posted 27 June 2006 - 2:32 PM
They did it in 2 weeks and the mixing took 4 weeks.
They wanted to see what they could produce in spontaneousness, and thought if they did something people would like and buy, something commercial, it would sound bad.
So now we know HAA wad more an experiment and womething very personal.
#178
Posted 29 June 2006 - 9:17 AM
Ben_j Escribi�:
HAA was done in 2 weeks ! That's Thomas Bangalter and Guyman De Homem Christo's words.
They did it in 2 weeks and the mixing took 4 weeks.
They wanted to see what they could produce in spontaneousness, and thought if they did something people would like and buy, something commercial, it would sound bad.
So now we know HAA wad more an experiment and womething very personal.
they didnt wanna do something commercial??? i believe technologic was all over the i-pod commercial
and if they think they can get away with 6 weeks worth of production, they're sadly mistaken.
#179
Posted 29 June 2006 - 9:19 AM
Bosco Escribi�:
Ben_j Escribi�:
HAA was done in 2 weeks ! That's Thomas Bangalter and Guyman De Homem Christo's words.
They did it in 2 weeks and the mixing took 4 weeks.
They wanted to see what they could produce in spontaneousness, and thought if they did something people would like and buy, something commercial, it would sound bad.
So now we know HAA wad more an experiment and womething very personal.
they didnt wanna do something commercial??? i believe technologic was all over the i-pod commercial
and if they think they can get away with 6 weeks worth of production, they're sadly mistaken.
*and if they think they can get away with 6 weeks worth of production again, they're sadly mistaken.