Forum
Daft Punk New Album?
#362
Posted 21 September 2013 - 7:25 AM
I've accepted this. I understand this is the way it works when becoming mainstream. Where I become disappointed, is that R.A.M. is sub par. To waste so much attention and effort on a bad album that will influence the masses and give credibility to this mediocre electronic music, is extremely disappointing.
If that makes me an angry teenage music snob, so be it.
#363
Posted 21 September 2013 - 7:34 AM
Bouh, on 20 September 2013 - 8:54 AM, said:
Bouh, the pop culture in our respective countries is not the same. I'm sure "Get Lucky" is probably the new national anthem in France by now. Respectable electronic artists get little to no attention here in America. So when a quality group like Daft Punk has the opportunity on a grand scale to influence the the casual listener, only to put out a stinker. It's horribly disappointing.
But seriously guys, I'm done talking Daft Punk. Save your insults and continue to think I'm crazy.
#364
Posted 21 September 2013 - 3:27 PM
On a sad note, I heard Get Lucky this morning and it brought a tear to my eye - I haven't got lucky for a while.
#366
Posted 22 September 2013 - 1:08 AM
They had the cheek of teasing the fans of a 1 min preview of this film clip and now they finally release it, and all it is is the preview but goes for 4 mins (people dancing bowing down to Mr. Ego himself Pharell.
#367
Posted 22 September 2013 - 1:24 AM
mikl, on 22 September 2013 - 1:08 AM, said:
Yeah the vid's a bit boring. I think I prefer the unofficial video I embedded back on p16 of this thread.
On a vaguely DP related matter, this weeks NME has a free Franz Ferdinand CD stuck to the front of it. It includes DP's mix of Take Me Out which hasn't been especially easy (or cheap) to find on CD up to now, as far as I know. http://www.discogs.c...release/4925597
#368
Posted 22 September 2013 - 6:15 AM
skyscraper, on 22 September 2013 - 12:24 PM, said:
Did Ben J happen to post it on facebook by any chance? Hilarious.
that remix is basically the original but with distortion from the contact song throughout. WTF (oh and seem record pops and scratches at the start) They need to stop taking lines of coke they can now afford so they can get there heads straight again.
#369
Posted 22 September 2013 - 9:45 AM
mikl, on 22 September 2013 - 6:15 AM, said:
that remix is basically the original but with distortion from the contact song throughout. WTF (oh and seem record pops and scratches at the start) They need to stop taking lines of coke they can now afford so they can get there heads straight again.
I don't follow Ben J on facebook. Please explain. ('following' may be more of a Twitter term but, whatever)
Yeah I never said the DP mix was any good! I bought the 12" blind when it came out (HMV had a blurb stuck to their display copy in the shop saying something like: Buy this, it's rare and it's amazing). I was a bit disappointed when I got home and played it. Mentioned it here in case some DP or FF completists might like to know about the NME cd anyway.
#370
Posted 22 September 2013 - 5:59 PM
mikl, on 22 September 2013 - 7:15 AM, said:
ha yeah one of the laziest remixes I've ever heard! Though I still prefer it to the original!
#371
Posted 22 September 2013 - 6:50 PM
mikl, on 22 September 2013 - 1:15 AM, said:
that remix is basically the original but with distortion from the contact song throughout. WTF (oh and seem record pops and scratches at the start) They need to stop taking lines of coke they can now afford so they can get there heads straight again.
ok, lemme teach you about the remix, it was made in 2004, and that "distortion" sound was from way before contact. That's actually a Juno 106 making that sound, it's like one of their signature sounds, it was used in most of Homework (Burnin' Rollin N Scratchin', Rock N Roll,) and in Discovery (Aerodynamic) and TRON (I forget which composition but it's in one of them, I want to say it's The Fall)
/daftnerd
#372
Posted 22 September 2013 - 8:02 PM
Bosco, on 21 September 2013 - 9:25 AM, said:
R.A.M is electronic music now? Really?
#374
Posted 25 September 2013 - 1:23 PM
MadPooter, on 25 September 2013 - 3:57 AM, said:
But I don't know if you remember this duo called "Daft Punk." They made nothing but electronic music.
Everybody has been using synthesizers from hip hop producers to rock bands. As far as I know they are not categorized as electronic acts, are they? This definition is just wrong.
I just don't get your last point. Are you arguing that R.A.M has to be thought as electronic music because of the previous records that daft punk made?
According to many interviews they did, they wanted to produce a reccord that was different from their previous work.
#375
Posted 25 September 2013 - 8:02 PM
Bouh, on 25 September 2013 - 8:23 AM, said:
I just don't get your last point. Are you arguing that R.A.M has to be thought as electronic music because of the previous records that daft punk made?
According to many interviews they did, they wanted to produce a reccord that was different from their previous work.
unless you count Doin' It Right, and I do hear a lot of synthesizers throughout the album, and some drum machines, so it's a little electronic, but for the most, it's disco. They are doing music that layed the groundwork for Homework, Discovery, etc. Which was mainly disco, but then there was premature electronic music (Giorgio by Moroder, Doin' it Right) influence, so it's technically both.
#376
Posted 25 September 2013 - 9:42 PM
Mr. Hoosteen, on 25 September 2013 - 10:02 PM, said:
They barely used any drum machine on this album except for doing it right. Again, many hip hop producers use a machine drum, it doesn't make them electronic music producers
It's not about what you use but the way you use it. Should we consider the chemical brothers as a rock band since they used some guitar tracks in their records? It doesn't make any sense.
#377
Posted 25 September 2013 - 10:22 PM
#378
Posted 25 September 2013 - 10:42 PM
#379
Posted 25 September 2013 - 11:02 PM
#380
Posted 25 September 2013 - 11:08 PM
Bouh, on 25 September 2013 - 11:42 PM, said:
It's not about what you use but the way you use it. Should we consider the chemical brothers as a rock band since they used some guitar tracks in their records? It doesn't make any sense.
So what do you believe is the right ratio to called it either way?
Daft Punk has been producing electronic based music all along, and even though RAM contains live instrument and funk elements, it still has a fair share of electronic influences and ingredients(among which I'd like to count the style of Discotoo). Or how else would you understand their tribute to Giorgio Moroder if they wouldn't understand themselves as coming "from the electronic" section of music? Furthermore, how would you explain their PR-strategy to produce themselves as robots in a spaceship type of thing with a touch of oldschool vinyl?