TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers: Singles 93-03 Reviewed - TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers

Jump to content

home

Forum

Singles 93-03 Reviewed

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot reply to this topic

#1 propertop   User is offline

  • Fan
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 15-September 03

Posted 15 September 2003 - 1:12 PM

We've recently added a review of the singles 93-03 compilation on propertop.com



Have a peek X-D

#2 Gundhi   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 729
  • Joined: 07-July 03

Posted 15 September 2003 - 2:24 PM

IS THIS A NEW KIND OF SPAM???????

#3 chemicalreaction   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 15 September 2003 - 3:42 PM

Here is the review which is on that site

The Chemical Brothers :: The Singles 93 - 03







It?s only when you listen to this compilation that you realise how consistently good Tom and Ed have been over the past decade (yes it?s really that long since the ?song to the siren?) and how they?ve gone from extreme underground to being household names



Having witnessed them in the early years in their Dustier format playing/DJing in sweaty pubs, student flats and gay attics, I watched their meteoric rise with both a sense of pride and a genuine hope that they wouldn?t sell-out and become one hit wonders. I?m glad to say they didn?t, instead using their newfound fame to recruit some indie heroes and injecting some well needed funk into them. Whatever these two unassuming stars put their hands to it?s always something rather enduring, containing a catchy hook that makes you wanna hear it again and again with some lost genius of a sample combined with a tooth-loosening bass line. Just when you think their unique brand of Indielectro-hop (hey I just made a new scene up!) can go no further along comes new single ?The Golden Path? a glorious sun-tinged yet melancholy number that features The Flaming Lips but sounds more like Echo and the Bunnymen to me. It must be nice to know every single you?ve released in ten years has at the worst been pretty good and at the best genre-creating brilliance. Nice one Tom & Ed, you?ve still rockin the block after all these years

#4 chemicalreaction   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 15 September 2003 - 6:03 PM

While we are on the topic of review...i really enjoyed this review

Chemical Brothers : Portsmouth Guildhall



There should be a law banning rock stars from ever going to Africa. They leave as decent, rock-fearing pop icons, spend ten minutes watching some ?ethnic? drumming from the safety of their penthouse suite window, suddenly ?discover? the concept of rhythm and come back as self-righteous World Music tossers intent on introducing the globe to the wonders of the Zimbabwean knee cymbal. Before you know it they?ve replaced their drummer with someone called ?Saucerface? hitting mummified elephant cocks with a stick, joined Amnesty International, collaborated with Ladysmith Black Mambazo on 'Later...' and become good mates with Sting. Sorry Damon, but nothing sends a healthy pop career down the crapper faster than exposure to the house band in a safari station gift shop.



So ban all rock stars from Africa. But make all DJs go, by law. How over are The Chemical Brothers, eh? They?re so snogging-goths-down-student-night-in-?97, so snakebite and big beat, so September 10th. ?Surrender? and ?Come With Us? have exposed them as one-trick phoneys and their keep-the-cab-waiting ?collaborations? with indie royalty have become so laughably Dadrock that Kelly Jones must be pencilling seven minutes out of his 2003 schedule as we speak.



The dance zeitgeist has been hijacked by gak-toting estate ruffians and Birmingham brandy addicts and - now Timotei Tom?s luscious Anneka Rice locks have been so savagely shorn - they?ve got all the charisma and sex appeal of a sack of chopped liver. They?re the techno Weller, a stuck-in-the-mud nostalgia turn who?ve owned up to their dinosaur irrelevance by hanging a motorised Pink Floyd circular screen over the stage. Look darling, The Chemical Brothers are in town! Ring the babysitter, we?re going for a jitterbug! Let?s hope there?s inflatable pigs!



So how come, when The Chemical Brothers play their berzerker brand of warped world music, it?s the trip of a lifetime? It begins, as these things should, in Afrika-ka-ka-ka-ka-etc. ?Music: Response? explodes with blitz-mental burundi beats, ?Song To The Siren? finds choirs of howling gospel banshees clawing their way out of Ed?s sequencers and ?...Afrika? itself - complete with Flaming Fanny visuals - builds from a vaguely fruggable Vic?n?Bob gag into a tropical typhoon of robot rabbits. If Damon?s Mali album is a tourist trip around African culture, these tribal torrents take you deep into the heart of Congo darkness and make you dance like a savage to the horror within.



And, like the Eamonn Holmeses of stude-rave, they don?t let the journey end. They do ?Out Of Control? and we?re buzzing monks in an ancient Indian temple on 'Quadrophenia' scooters. They do the techno-Cardigans kitch of ?Star Guitar? And we?re making boxes in the Louvre pyramid, sorted for cappucino and Gogan. They do ?My Elastic Eye? and we?re pilled off our cheeseholes at the Nuremburg rally withDepeche Mode. They do ?Sunshine Underground? And, ladies and gentlemen, we are floating in space. ?Spiritualized?? it?s zero-gravity drone seems to sneer, ?that?s our laptop?s start-up noise?. Then it escalates into a roaring cacophony like ?A Day In The Life? being run over by stampeding buffalo. Incredible.



Like when Madonna has to have a ten-minute ballet break so she can go off and change her hat, The Bros indulge in a few lengthy rave breaks to give their massive screen time to jiggle about a bit. But by the time a Noel-free ?Setting Sun? catapults us into orbit and ?The Private Psychedelic Reel? crash-lands us in heaven surrounded by jiving stained-glass Jesuses and deafening swarms of David Lynch?s pet killer bees, we?ve forgiven them their Richard Ashcroft flirtations, Samson-esque hair massacres and big screen tomfoolery. The Guildhall isn?t in soggy old Portsmouth anymore, it?s on a Tibetan mountaintop at sunset and the circular screen is worshipped like Sun Ra. Not bad for a couple of boring, shit-haired dorks whose stage performance only stretches to jumping about like burning puppies in a box full of hedgehogs during ?Hey Boy Hey Girl?.



The Chemicals? pioneering work in the field of the dance/rock crossover may have faltered at the Get Some Pop Stars To Sing stage ? that ball?s in your court now, Super Furries. But when it comes to awaking the primal beast inside every economics student, there?s not an open-topped bus tour round Mali to match it.



Mark Beaumont


#5 Joslyn   User is offline

  • Lurking about
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1738
  • Joined: 20-May 03
  • LocationHere

Posted 16 September 2003 - 12:57 AM

ChemicalReaction, I don't want to be a dick but meteors only come down ;-) Great review printed. We don't get in in the Netherlands. Thanks, excellent!

#6 mcmarsh   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4002
  • Joined: 05-November 02
  • LocationLeeds, UK

Posted 16 September 2003 - 7:26 PM

I think he got it from NME.

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users