TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers: Happy Birthday, Ed! - TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers

Jump to content

home

Forum

Happy Birthday, Ed!

  • 3 Pages
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot reply to this topic

#41 Krisper   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1098
  • Joined: 18-June 09
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 14 June 2013 - 10:07 PM

I am sure Tom and Ed don't need me to stick up for them, but you are wrong.

I went to 2 Chems DJ sets this year, front row for a total of 5 hours, and both Tom and Ed were having a ball. I saw them in a whole new light.

In their live shows they are working with so much equipment that they don't have a lot of time to work with the audience, but at their DJ sets I was in total awe at how much they were both getting into it and having so much fun. Both of them really reached out and touched the crowd.

Honestly, I wonder if you are talking about the same guys. And yeah, wrong thread for this argument FFS. Sorry Ed, and Happy Birthday again!
Further Remixed There's nothing else...

#42 chemicalreaction   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 14 June 2013 - 10:23 PM

Okay so maybe I got carried away and made this so dramatic. LOL. I know its foolish to judge them from one bad dj set.



Once again I apologize for being a troll. It was fun for me but I will now go die.

#43 whirlygirl   User is offline

  • dork
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 15302
  • Joined: 06-November 02
  • Locationin the valley of the acid clowns

Posted 14 June 2013 - 10:32 PM

No, you don't need to go die, don't be so silly and dramatic! :P

For what it's worth I think it's good to apologize. It makes a man the better man.

I hope what you said on the last page isn't true that you are going to stop listening to the Chemical Brothers because you aren't happy with the last couple of tracks. You're within your right to not like every single thing Tom and Ed do.

But seriously. The worst birthday wish ever would be to say you were gonna stop listening to the Chemical Brothers!
be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle

#44 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4504
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 14 June 2013 - 10:49 PM

View Postchemicalreaction, on 14 June 2013 - 11:47 PM, said:

I apologize for talking about this in Ed's birthday thread. I wish him best wishes always. But it literally feels like Tom and Ed have no passion left for the music. Recent tracks on Phantasy are sub-par. Through me is good but not fucking great. Nothing but pleasure is though inspired, very ineffective after the first drop. I've been a believer of chems since forever and now I see them slipping so I feel like I should address it. If we as fans don't care then Chems don't care. If Chems don't care then I'm sorry to say that the future of music is looking very bleek. Are we going to allow the future generation to listen to skrillex? Our kids growing up to listen to trance dubstep ? Is this what we want? NO we don't. I'm not going to listen to chems anymore starting today, until and unless they produce/dj something good. Continue to live in the delusion that chems are making great music and we'll have a "Plookaville" and "human after all" type album coming soon.


Ah, now I see where you might coming from. I wasn't pleased with "Nothing but Pleasure" as well, in fact couldn't stand it and said so here on the forums. But at no time it evoked any connotations of poor future chems music or anything related that might be on the horizon. I really liked the Hanna OST, the velodrome song was also quite nice and suitable for a cycling theme. Nope, I'm not able to see this kind of black smoke of pessimism so far.
And as for the dj set. Well, I wouldn't be thrilled all the time either. No day's like the other. But I do concur that the behavioral attitude of audiences has been going downhill since the mainstream utilization of smartphones an the like.

And btw, to stop listening to great music (what ever this might encompass) is like giving up on eating good strawberry cakes just because of one stale strawberry in the past.
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#45 WhiteNoise   User is online

  • Hmm... I was confused.
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2230
  • Joined: 28-November 09
  • LocationPurdue University

Posted 15 June 2013 - 4:09 AM

Posted Image

Just keep in mind, judging their future work based on Through Me/Nothing But Pleasure is like judging their future based on some obscure b-side like Buzz Tracks or The Rock Drill. Plus, it was a solo release, and those typically are different from the band's normal body of work.
SAVE FERRIS FORUM

#46 chemicalreaction   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 15 June 2013 - 5:56 AM

LOL, no way is that picture an accurate description of what has happened here so far. If you consider Chems to be a wild bear then I'd be a little mouse. I'm judging Chems based on what I hear. Its safe to say that Through me and nothing but pleasure could be considered unofficially next in line of electronic battle weapons. They get released between albums and are handed out to selected djs. Sort of what happened to these two tracks before Erol decided to release them on his label. A little tease of what the future album might sound like. Also, Superflash is not that exciting you have to admit. Quality of these tracks is very b-sideish, unfinished though not released with that intention.

#47 chemicalreaction   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 15 June 2013 - 6:03 AM

View PostCsar, on 15 June 2013 - 12:49 AM, said:

Ah, now I see where you might coming from. I wasn't pleased with "Nothing but Pleasure" as well, in fact couldn't stand it and said so here on the forums. But at no time it evoked any connotations of poor future chems music or anything related that might be on the horizon. I really liked the Hanna OST, the velodrome song was also quite nice and suitable for a cycling theme. Nope, I'm not able to see this kind of black smoke of pessimism so far.
And as for the dj set. Well, I wouldn't be thrilled all the time either. No day's like the other. But I do concur that the behavioral attitude of audiences has been going downhill since the mainstream utilization of smartphones an the like.

And btw, to stop listening to great music (what ever this might encompass) is like giving up on eating good strawberry cakes just because of one stale strawberry in the past.


Too much strawberry cake is bad for you. I don't want to have any weight issues. LMAO

#48 ThePumisher   User is offline

  • K+D+B
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3128
  • Joined: 01-June 07
  • LocationCGN CTY

Posted 15 June 2013 - 7:55 AM

View PostWhiteNoise, on 15 June 2013 - 5:09 AM, said:

is like judging their future based on some obscure b-side like Buzz Tracks


but me loves buzz tracks, one of my favourite tracks of them :(

#49 Bouh   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 554
  • Joined: 25-November 07

Posted 15 June 2013 - 9:18 AM

Give them some time. They are just about to reach the studio again and probably blow your mind again. Remember further? I'm not such a big fan of "nothing but pleaser" and "Superflash" either. But c'mon that's just 2 songs within their impressive discog. I have never been disapointed by any of their albums.

I tend not to listen to the chems that much though. Cause it makes feel like a bad muscian compared to their abilities to produce amazing songs.

Happy Birthday Again Ed.

#50 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4504
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 15 June 2013 - 3:42 PM

View PostWhiteNoise, on 15 June 2013 - 6:09 AM, said:

Just keep in mind, judging their future work based on Through Me/Nothing But Pleasure is like judging their future based on some obscure b-side like Buzz Tracks or The Rock Drill. Plus, it was a solo release, and those typically are different from the band's normal body of work.

Oh boy, if this reasoning had been true for me, I would have given up on them since the release of Swiper ...
And btw, I really like the fact, that Tom's solo projects sound quite different from the "natural" chems sound. It gives me the feeling that the band and their unique sounds can't be separated from another.
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#51 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4504
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 15 June 2013 - 3:46 PM

View Postchemicalreaction, on 15 June 2013 - 7:56 AM, said:

LOL, no way is that picture an accurate description of what has happened here so far. If you consider Chems to be a wild bear then I'd be a little mouse. I'm judging Chems based on what I hear. Its safe to say that Through me and nothing but pleasure could be considered unofficially next in line of electronic battle weapons. They get released between albums and are handed out to selected djs. Sort of what happened to these two tracks before Erol decided to release them on his label. A little tease of what the future album might sound like. Also, Superflash is not that exciting you have to admit. Quality of these tracks is very b-sideish, unfinished though not released with that intention.

Yeah, and they're not even Chems releases. It's Tom only. And that said, his RAW re-interpretation of I Break Horses' Hearts was top notch.

Superflash, on the other hand, sounds fine as it is to me.
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#52 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4504
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 15 June 2013 - 3:48 PM

View Postchemicalreaction, on 15 June 2013 - 8:03 AM, said:

Too much strawberry cake is bad for you. I don't want to have any weight issues. LMAO

You can stick with the strawberrys then ;)
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

  • 3 Pages
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users