Forum
Surface to Air
#2
Posted 01 February 2005 - 11:49 PM
Surface to Air hits all the right notes live but I think the studio version would benefit from not having those vocoded samples at the start and from being a couple of minutes longer.
#8
Posted 02 February 2005 - 5:57 PM
ACIDCHILDREN Escribi�:
I think its one of the most powerfull lovely tracks they have ever made. I reall prefere it to Star Guitar. I think the ending is good, because you don't expect it to end suddenly like that.
i can see what your saying but i doubt you said that about the end of AONO, i am very dissapointed with the surface to air finish, very dissapointed indeed.
#9
Posted 02 February 2005 - 6:26 PM
#11
Posted 03 February 2005 - 3:45 AM
#12
Posted 03 February 2005 - 3:47 AM
I think the end of Surface To Air takes you by surprise, for sure. It's not your typical drawn out Chemical outtro. But it does create an image in the mind's eye - something the Chems are also [i]that[i/] good at. Like what's been said in various threads involving the Surface to Air ending debate - it's like drawing your breath in after holding it for so long, like taking all that air in your lungs when you reach the surface.
#13
Posted 03 February 2005 - 3:49 AM
whirlygirl Escribi�:
Wow, I can understand not liking the ending but to say the ending is cheap and lacks inspiration is a bit of a low blow. I think if they wanted to draw out the ending then they could have quite easily. Epic endings are something, it seems, Tom and Ed could probably do in their sleep - I don't mean to denigrate their skills at crafting lovely and inspiring outtros, just pointing out they are that good at what they do.
I think the end of Surface To Air takes you by surprise, for sure. It's not your typical drawn out Chemical outtro. But it does create an image in the mind's eye - something the Chems are also [i]that[i/] good at. Like what's been said in various threads involving the Surface to Air ending debate - it's like drawing your breath in after holding it for so long, like taking all that air in your lungs when you reach the surface.
Nice description, but IMHO it still sucks.
#14
Posted 03 February 2005 - 3:54 AM
Slipvin Escribi�:
whirlygirl Escribi�:
Wow, I can understand not liking the ending but to say the ending is cheap and lacks inspiration is a bit of a low blow. I think if they wanted to draw out the ending then they could have quite easily. Epic endings are something, it seems, Tom and Ed could probably do in their sleep - I don't mean to denigrate their skills at crafting lovely and inspiring outtros, just pointing out they are that good at what they do.
I think the end of Surface To Air takes you by surprise, for sure. It's not your typical drawn out Chemical outtro. But it does create an image in the mind's eye - something the Chems are also [i]that[i/] good at. Like what's been said in various threads involving the Surface to Air ending debate - it's like drawing your breath in after holding it for so long, like taking all that air in your lungs when you reach the surface.
Nice description, but IMHO it still sucks.
Not to get bitchy and pick on you, but so do baseless comments such as this. It cheapens the forum, and does little to inspire creative debate.
You don't have to loooooooooooooooove everything the Chems do, but the negativity here as of late is getting very tiring. Back up what you say, good or bad.
#16
Posted 03 February 2005 - 3:57 AM
[DISCLAIMER]
#18
Posted 04 February 2005 - 2:18 AM
whirlygirl Escribi�:
Slipvin Escribi�:
whirlygirl Escribi�:
Wow, I can understand not liking the ending but to say the ending is cheap and lacks inspiration is a bit of a low blow. I think if they wanted to draw out the ending then they could have quite easily. Epic endings are something, it seems, Tom and Ed could probably do in their sleep - I don't mean to denigrate their skills at crafting lovely and inspiring outtros, just pointing out they are that good at what they do.
I think the end of Surface To Air takes you by surprise, for sure. It's not your typical drawn out Chemical outtro. But it does create an image in the mind's eye - something the Chems are also [i]that[i/] good at. Like what's been said in various threads involving the Surface to Air ending debate - it's like drawing your breath in after holding it for so long, like taking all that air in your lungs when you reach the surface.
Nice description, but IMHO it still sucks.
Not to get bitchy and pick on you, but so do baseless comments such as this. It cheapens the forum, and does little to inspire creative debate.
You don't have to loooooooooooooooove everything the Chems do, but the negativity here as of late is getting very tiring. Back up what you say, good or bad.
Why? It sucks. It's a cheap ending. Like they were out of ideas. Or didn't want to work on it anymore. Maybe it was stress, or a sudden urge for hamburgers, who knows? Imho It's not the way to end a huge building fucker like that. I stick with cheap.
#20
Posted 04 February 2005 - 4:36 AM
whirlygirl Escribi�:
Wow, I can understand not liking the ending but to say the ending is cheap and lacks inspiration is a bit of a low blow. I think if they wanted to draw out the ending then they could have quite easily. Epic endings are something, it seems, Tom and Ed could probably do in their sleep - I don't mean to denigrate their skills at crafting lovely and inspiring outtros, just pointing out they are that good at what they do.
ohhhhh HELL yes!!! that statement is just right on!! The end of Surface to Air is perfect the way it is...sh00t...that little gem is like the perfect end to that album....