DELETED

mc marsh Escribi�:

I'm gonna buy some decks and learn to mix properly 8) .

Sweet, my buddy bought the technics 1200, the silver ones, they are so nice, he gave me one of the stickers that come with them. I think he's getting good.



I decided to buy a CD mixer, I heard you get much more control. Plus I have a whole wack load of CD's and I like new technology. LET THE MUSIC FLY!!!



ohhh God I had the best party idea last night before I went to sleep. Establish a set right, and you orchestrate a bunch of jet planes flying overhead to blend in with the music. This party would have to be outdoors, and you could have the jet's fly past a couple of times. That would be nutty, simply nutty.

You would need the jets to come relatively close to have a full sound blasting experience, but not close enough so that people get torched. Wow, that would be mind boggling, i'm not talking about jets flying overhead that's just boring, but having a musical set that is coordinated with the jets, making them part of the song. Maybe a break of a second or two then the jets come blasting by, as soon as the sound of the jet dissapates you slam on the beats and the crowd goes fucking bezerk.....my palms are all sweaty.

DELETED

SelfExel Escribi�:

You would need the jets to come relatively close to have a full sound blasting experience, but not close enough so that people get torched. Wow, that would be mind boggling, i'm not talking about jets flying overhead that's just boring, but having a musical set that is coordinated with the jets, making them part of the song. Maybe a break of a second or two then the jets come blasting by, as soon as the sound of the jet dissapates you slam on the beats and the crowd goes fucking bezerk.....my palms are all sweaty.

I read it in an interview of Tom and Ed and Tom saying that how when he is playing TPPR live he gets this feeling of a plane going over their heads and then he goes on talking about how it is tempting to turn up the volume to the max when playing live. The jet idea would totally ROCK. Try it sometime and invite me to see it. Bizzare.

Anyone seen that U2 video ('Beautiful day') where they're performing on a runway and there's planes flying right out over them? It would probably be something like that. 8)

DELETED

He's right. Airplanes suck.

DELETED

Thanks antype and if I ever have the power to throw such a party i'm sure lots of people will hear about it.



Well the beauty of the experience would come when the sound of the jets flying overhead become part of the music, and this would have to be some serious music too! Furthermore the jets would be the climax of the song, repeated several times. I'm also not talking about some silly ass planes i'm saying like 3 of these:







I bealive this is a F18 reaching the speed of sound. Now, you would want this sucker to be flying at a nice distance, where you get some serious jet sound but not too low so that the crowd is deafened.



You could also have 3 of these, for a different sound and visuals.







Both would be very very ill, i'm sure the chances of an accident happening are very small.

It is a wonderful idea ... and just when jets fly by drop in the beats...OMG sounds awesome.

But if they really should cross the speed of sound, there won't be a decent sound... more a really huge bass drum.

yea but just the feeling of a jet fly by would be cool 8)

DELETED

200000 ! wow i am suprised

I think there was 1 000 000 in London on February 15th........ :)

Say no to a war on Iraq!! Its all about the oil!!

There will be no war. There will be a quick battle. Understand it and accept the fact that nothing will stop it. Chances are that the U.S will fall to the Iraqi military.

They'll probably be a big street battle in Baghdad (what Saddam wants) and it end up like the Vietnam war.

I don't want a war on Iraq because I don't want innocent civilians to die :'( . Saddam Hussain poses very little threat to the world, unlike Al-queda--there is no way that these two are linked. Bush just wants the oil.

I could talk about this all day but I won't. ;-)

(If you want to hear my view on things, e mail me)

mc marsh Escribi�:

They'll probably be a big street battle in Baghdad (what Saddam wants) and it end up like the Vietnam war.

I don't want a war on Iraq because I don't want innocent civilians to die :'( . Saddam Hussain poses very little threat to the world, unlike Al-queda--there is no way that these two are linked. Bush just wants the oil.

I could talk about this all day but I won't. ;-)

(If you want to hear my view on things, e mail me)

A street battle only if the US doesn't turn that country into a sinkhole from the numerous airstrikes that will rain down on Iraq.



The loss of civilian life is inevitable in war and is very very rarely justifiable. Saddam Hussein is a complete nutcase who terrorizes his own people - he needs to be removed or a deal needs to be cut so he may step down. He is not a nice guy. His people do not have a voice, there is no democracy in Iraq, and the sanctions the US and Britain have on Iraq originally intended to punish Saddam Hussein have hurt the Iraqi people instead and that is why there is much more animosity geared toward the US and Britain. BUT I do not think it is the US' job to remove him from power - removing him from power should have, absolute backing by the United Nations as a whole. Iraq's military capabilities are mute compared to the warheads that could do the kind of damage that the US, Russia, China, or N. Korea, India or Pakistan can. Hussein is more a threat to his own people, not so much to the world. His ties with the Al Queda... that would not surprise me but there's no real way of knowing. What we do know is that US allies in the Middle East have ties to the Al Queda but a blind eye is turned because of the and the world's reliance ($) on oil which has been filtered and shuffled to the AQ network in one way shape or form. It doesn't take rocket science to figure that out.



Besides, a lot of the Middle Eastern Allies are in direct violation of human rights but the US has conveniently turned it's head away toward Iraq because it's convenient and there's money to be had there.



Bush not only wants control of the land because he has vested interest in the oil reserves there - but he's come back to finish the job his daddy started under the guise of UN violations. Just like with Reagan and with Bush Sr, there always has to be a scapegoat and Saddam Hussein is, once again, the flavor of the presidency which may linger into the next presidential election.



The saddest thing of all, beside the loss of human life, is that a war with Iraq will have dire repurcussions that could possibly have adverse effects on our global economy and global society as a whole. This could mean more sanctions, more rampant anti-Semitism, anti-Muslim, anti-Christian - anti- you-name-it and quite frankly, it all is a sad regression of the human race.



The bottom line is, the UN does not fully back a war against Iraq even though Iraq has successfully ignored 17 (or something like that ) UN mandates revolving around human rights and weapons manufacturing. But, would the US going to war with Iraq without the UN's approval not be in direct violation on international policy?



Bush is a scarey scarey man. He is no more intelligent now than he was on 9-10-2001. I don't see how so many people from my country can support a man who is so impulsive, vengeful, and dumb that he's dangerous..



I too could go on about this all day but I'll spare you from any more of my liberal political diatribe.

whirlygirl Escribi�:

Bush is a scarey scarey man. He is no more intelligent now than he was on 9-10-2001. I don't see how so many people from my country can support a man who is so impulsive, vengeful, and dumb that he's dangerous..

First the McDonalds thread, now this view of things... whirlygirl, you are about to become my favorite american. :)



Us germans learned our lesson from the things that happened about 50 years ago, and now Powell and Rumsfeld try to blame us for that. Guess they did not learn anything at all from history.





"History teaches us that history does not teach us."

(Ghandi)