I didn't wanna turn this tread into a personal attack on anybody, I apologize if it turned out that way. I think Bosco was the only one that understood where I was coming from. When I first heard the single I was so dissapointed with it, and then I went to this topic and realised the majority of the people were giving at 'amazing', 'mind-blowing', even 'the best single' comments. I just couldn't believe it, so I immediately thought - this forum has way too many fanboy/fangirls.
What i tried to do with my comments is start a meaningful discussion (I mean aren't you guys sick those 'favourite food' and 'currently listening' topics), where we put our opinions and feelings forward without making a stupid 'one-liner' comments (toomuch'stash- lay off the drugs man). I admit that i have purposely tried to stir up some crap in order to wake up everybody. This forum has lately become to much of a lovely- dovely, 'everything is great' wonderland, without any meaningful or even interesting topics/posts/disscussions.
I didn't want to become an 'enemy number one' with my posts (where's Slipvin when you need him) but I think a lot of you people were far more hurtful and unwilling to understand my feelings in your response to my posts than I was to anybody else. Oh well, at least people are starting to put a bit of passion behind their replys.
Forum
do it again
MultiQuote
#582
- doin' it after dark
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 6304
- Joined: 10-June 04
- Locationthe Canadian Shield
Posted 17 April 2007 - 10:43 AM
I understood where you were coming from, and you're certainly entitled to your opinion, just think you could have been a bit more civil about it. Though I'll admit most everyone rose to the bait and fed it back.
While stirring up meaningful debate is a good thing, getting personal with people usually doesn't generate meaningful responses. Which is why I don't think anyone should be getting rowdy. Passionate? For sure.
While stirring up meaningful debate is a good thing, getting personal with people usually doesn't generate meaningful responses. Which is why I don't think anyone should be getting rowdy. Passionate? For sure.
#592
- JeanieBeanie!
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 7883
- Joined: 01-March 04
- LocationAmsterdam
Posted 17 April 2007 - 7:55 PM
Ehehehehe X-D
I actually had this conversation with Ed in person , and i dont recall seeing any tears rolling down his cheeks.
Ed himself is not a big fan of prescription beats , for example.
I actually had this conversation with Ed in person , and i dont recall seeing any tears rolling down his cheeks.
Ed himself is not a big fan of prescription beats , for example.
#593
- Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 58
- Joined: 21-March 07
Posted 17 April 2007 - 8:40 PM
prescription beats is one thing......
but lost in the k-hole? of all the chem tracks, that one gets caught in my head the most...well, i tend to have a different chem track in my head on a daily basis, but k-hole more than others....classic
for shame.
but its cool 8) if everybody liked and listened to it, it wouldnt be what it is eh?
but lost in the k-hole? of all the chem tracks, that one gets caught in my head the most...well, i tend to have a different chem track in my head on a daily basis, but k-hole more than others....classic
for shame.
but its cool 8) if everybody liked and listened to it, it wouldnt be what it is eh?
#594
- Did ya synth just burp?
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4507
- Joined: 14-February 04
- LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind
Posted 17 April 2007 - 8:43 PM
anType Escribi�:
Wow, that's a shocker 8O
I think it's a beautiful piece of art, that tune.
But, oh well.... However, I'm just a bit shocked 8O
So was I! Ban or not ban is the question here! X-D
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²
#595
- Did ya synth just burp?
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4507
- Joined: 14-February 04
- LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind
Posted 17 April 2007 - 8:46 PM
Ben_j Escribi�:
anType Escribi�:
LEAST FAVE TRACKS??!! :o
OMG that's not just a shocker, that's a double-kill!! *faints*
Jeanie ! You killed anType :o :'( Are you happy now ?
He's been killed already one time by an admin. And he's back. I'm not religious but you could say he's a chemical Jesus, ha!
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²
#596
- Did ya synth just burp?
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4507
- Joined: 14-February 04
- LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind
Posted 17 April 2007 - 8:47 PM
Jeanie Escribi�:
Ehehehehe X-D
I actually had this conversation with Ed in person , and i dont recall seeing any tears rolling down his cheeks.
Ed himself is not a big fan of prescription beats , for example.
Damn, haven't heard it yet.
I guess to remember Ed said he also didn't like BRB because he couldn't imagine how to dance to. X-D
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²
#597
- Did ya synth just burp?
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4507
- Joined: 14-February 04
- LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind
Posted 17 April 2007 - 8:50 PM
AnalogSneaker25 Escribi�:
prescription beats is one thing......
but lost in the k-hole? of all the chem tracks, that one gets caught in my head the most...well, i tend to have a different chem track in my head on a daily basis, but k-hole more than others....classic
for shame.
but its cool 8) if everybody liked and listened to it, it wouldnt be what it is eh?
Nope, it still would be a damn funky-disco number and just lost . . . in the K-Hole. Btw, did Ed say what K-Hole means, Jeanie?
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²
#600
- Did ya synth just burp?
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4507
- Joined: 14-February 04
- LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind
Posted 17 April 2007 - 9:40 PM
Jeanie Escribi�:
Well , it's pretty obvious what it means.
There's only one thing that lost in the k-hole means.
Yes ... yes ... and what, bottle-Jeanie :-?
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²