TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers: Dig your Own Hole scriptum - TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers

Jump to content

home

Forum

Dig your Own Hole scriptum

  • 3 Pages
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot reply to this topic

#21 Thor_Saytyr   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2554
  • Joined: 08-November 02

Posted 09 February 2003 - 7:31 PM

I just heard 'we have explosive', I need the CD now, it sounds damn good.

#22

  • Group: Guests

Posted 10 February 2003 - 5:56 AM

DELETED

#23 chemicalreaction   User is online

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 24 April 2004 - 6:42 PM

chemicalreaction Escribi�:

...yea but the album sucks


actually now i realize that the album rocks. Every track is so beautiful

#24 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4505
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 25 April 2004 - 9:12 PM

Hi!



Block Rockin' Beats

It's a very good rockin' tune and I love the way the beats go around. Wouldn't say that is too mainstream-like. It was the beginning of a new(er) sound I think... 8/10



Dig Your Own Hole

Oh my goodness!!! These beats are incredible, as well as the bassline! But there's a little (tiny little) BUT: I think the part that starts at minute 2 (where the bass is changing) could be repeated on more time at least. And they could have shortened the break with the up-pitched synth (3rd minute). That's all.. 8/10



Elektrobank

It's also a very veeery good sounding track. One could say a continue of DYOH concerning the beats just emphasized. These ones, when the person is speaking could be repeated one more time too. 7.5/10



Piku

Year, great one. Nice up-broken beats with nice synths and effects. Like this much. Listening to Elektrobank it gives you a rest to calm down a bit.

7.99999/10



Setting Sun

You have to listen to it several times to love it but when you do so you'll love it, just like me. Ok, the guitar, when it get distorted, could be hard for your ears but the beats are comensating for ear's pain X-D 7.5/10



It doesn't matter

Well, I think it's not a nice track. The brothers have made otherones much better songs than this one. At the beginning it's very promising (bassdrum and snare sound real-played) but then it's really disappointing to me. It has no variation in it. Was a simple techno-track. And I dislike techno. 0.5/10



Don't stop the rock

Yeah the beginnig is quite good!!! (big beatish), but then the same as the one before... Don't know where's the rock that hasn't to be stopped???

0.5/10

Get Uo On It like This

Wow, it's really my cup of tea and hits my breakbeat-lovin' taste!!! The one (or two) thing(s) is(are) it's too short and the first part could be repeated in this longer version. Every time I listen to it I understand, when the man is speaking, " verdunkeln, verdunkeln.." (English:darken)

9.5/10



Lost in the K-hole

Nothing to say. Great song that lets your feet start moving. Love the bassline and the bells (or whatever it is). Wonderful.

9.5/10



Where Do I start...

Like on every album released by the brothers there's a quite and chilly track. Very good transfered. Beth Orthon has a beautiful voice and the breaks make the track rounded off.

8/10



The Private...

Damn, one of the best track the brothers have ever made!!! I like the clarinet of Jonathan Donahue very much, and again the beeeats. I think that was why I fell in love with big beat. The track has got such a nice atmosphere, simply wow!!!

11/10
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#25 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4505
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 25 April 2004 - 9:18 PM

Csar Escribi�:

Hi!

for your ears but the beats are comensating for ear's pain X-D 7.5/10




Wanted to say compensating. One of many mistakes in the text..
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#26 GLAKO-FAHN   User is offline

  • vandal, first grade
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3658
  • Joined: 10-November 02
  • LocationToronto, Ontario, Canada

Posted 25 April 2004 - 11:05 PM

I'd have to say you're way off about Don't Stop The Rock and It Doesn't Matter. Gotta be a little more openminded... You say you don't like them because they lack variation and complexity but, because this is COMPLETELY FALSE, I think the reason you don't like them is because they aren't "big beat."
He put on a turn-down collar, a black bow, and wore his Sunday tail-coat. As such, he looked spruce, and what his clothes would not do, his instinct for making the most of his good looks would.

#27 Thor_Saytyr   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2554
  • Joined: 08-November 02

Posted 26 April 2004 - 6:37 AM

I think the chems are a bit too "big beat". I mean, they did pretty much define the genre, but when I listen to some of their songs, I cant help but notice and point out some of the predictable sounds and mixing methods alot of people seem to be using.

#28 whirlygirl   User is offline

  • dork
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 15302
  • Joined: 06-November 02
  • Locationin the valley of the acid clowns

Posted 26 April 2004 - 4:13 PM

Thor_Saytyr Escribi�:

I think the chems are a bit too "big beat". I mean, they did pretty much define the genre, but when I listen to some of their songs, I cant help but notice and point out some of the predictable sounds and mixing methods alot of people seem to be using.




But but but... too big beat? :? I think it's just a part of the grain here, just a part of their style. Thor, do you mean the Chems using the same methods/mixing styles as other people, or is it the other way around: people using the methods/mixing style of the Chems?



I always felt it was the latter. But that's just me opinion. :)
be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle

#29 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4505
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 26 April 2004 - 6:59 PM

GLAKO-FAHN Escribi�:

I'd have to say you're way off about Don't Stop The Rock and It Doesn't Matter. Gotta be a little more openminded... You say you don't like them because they lack variation and complexity but, because this is COMPLETELY FALSE, I think the reason you don't like them is because they aren't "big beat."




No no don't get me wrong! Has nothing to do with breakbeat at all. "Out of Control", "Hey Boy Hey Girl", "Got Glint?" are very beautiful tracks to name just a few of non-big beat stuff. But the ones are so much more varied than these two songs on DYOH. That's what I believe..
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#30 chemicalreaction   User is online

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 26 April 2004 - 9:52 PM

whirlygirl Escribi�:

Thor_Saytyr Escribi�:

I think the chems are a bit too "big beat". I mean, they did pretty much define the genre, but when I listen to some of their songs, I cant help but notice and point out some of the predictable sounds and mixing methods alot of people seem to be using.




But but but... too big beat? :? I think it's just a part of the grain here, just a part of their style. Thor, do you mean the Chems using the same methods/mixing styles as other people, or is it the other way around: people using the methods/mixing style of the Chems?



I always felt it was the latter. But that's just me opinion. :)


ofcourse you opinion is right and Thor is completely wrong

#31 whirlygirl   User is offline

  • dork
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 15302
  • Joined: 06-November 02
  • Locationin the valley of the acid clowns

Posted 27 April 2004 - 3:54 AM

chemicalreaction Escribi�:

whirlygirl Escribi�:

Thor_Saytyr Escribi�:

I think the chems are a bit too "big beat". I mean, they did pretty much define the genre, but when I listen to some of their songs, I cant help but notice and point out some of the predictable sounds and mixing methods alot of people seem to be using.




But but but... too big beat? :? I think it's just a part of the grain here, just a part of their style. Thor, do you mean the Chems using the same methods/mixing styles as other people, or is it the other way around: people using the methods/mixing style of the Chems?



I always felt it was the latter. But that's just me opinion. :)


ofcourse you opinion is right and Thor is completely wrong




:? Ooooooookaaaaaay...



I never said my opinion is right and Thor's is wrong. I didn't think this was a game and I apologize if I came across as a know-it-all. Last time I checked, I wanted to continue discussing so I asked a question mainly for clarification purposes since I think he brought up a valid point - and I just threw in my 2 cents to boot.
be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle

#32 Thor_Saytyr   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2554
  • Joined: 08-November 02

Posted 27 April 2004 - 6:56 AM

Hahaha. To make my 'opinion' clear, they sound BORING after a good couple of listens. Im not saying I dont like em' :D

#33 whirlygirl   User is offline

  • dork
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 15302
  • Joined: 06-November 02
  • Locationin the valley of the acid clowns

Posted 27 April 2004 - 7:13 AM

s'all clear now, gotcha! :P
be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle

#34 chemicalreaction   User is online

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 27 April 2004 - 5:13 PM

All i was tryin to say was i agree with whirly. sorry thor if i hurt your feelings. :'(

#35 whirlygirl   User is offline

  • dork
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 15302
  • Joined: 06-November 02
  • Locationin the valley of the acid clowns

Posted 27 April 2004 - 5:29 PM

Group ((((((hugs)))))) for everyone!!!!!
be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle

#36 chemicalreaction   User is online

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 27 April 2004 - 6:43 PM

;-) Awwwww

#37 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4505
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 27 April 2004 - 10:19 PM

Hi!



Does anyone of you know who's the person on the front cover of DYOH?
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#38 iguanapunk   User is offline

  • Tatsumaki-Senpū kyaku
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9574
  • Joined: 27-February 03
  • Location[-+-]

Posted 27 April 2004 - 10:21 PM

Looks like my mate donna. Would make a great tattoo inverted.
Posted Image

#39 GLAKO-FAHN   User is offline

  • vandal, first grade
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3658
  • Joined: 10-November 02
  • LocationToronto, Ontario, Canada

Posted 28 April 2004 - 1:17 AM

Paul Oakenfold, idn't it?
He put on a turn-down collar, a black bow, and wore his Sunday tail-coat. As such, he looked spruce, and what his clothes would not do, his instinct for making the most of his good looks would.

#40 🙈🙉🙊   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3831
  • Joined: 06-November 02

Posted 28 April 2004 - 1:25 AM

GLAKO-FAHN Escribi�:

Paul Oakenfold, idn't it?




i think thats an urban mith!! wasn't it just a picture tom and ed found in a skip out side there studio??? what were they doing seaching through a skip in the first place!!
I'm a fuckin doughnut

  • 3 Pages
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users