TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers: galvanize 12" - mistake or bootleg copy - TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers

Jump to content

home

Forum

galvanize 12" - mistake or bootleg copy

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot reply to this topic

#1 BoywiththeGoldenEyes   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4044
  • Joined: 05-November 04
  • LocationSarrebruck

Posted 21 February 2005 - 7:28 PM

maybe that has been topic in another thread already while i was off, if so - sorry.



my 12" copy of galvanize - CHEMST21 / 0724387659162 - is etched CHEMSTDJ 21 on A side and CHEMSTDJ 20 on B side. mike's the exchange etched in as well. anyone who discovered the same?
love is all.

#2 gristy   User is offline

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 22
  • Joined: 21-January 05

Posted 21 February 2005 - 7:41 PM

you posted in the other topic!

#3 BoywiththeGoldenEyes   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4044
  • Joined: 05-November 04
  • LocationSarrebruck

Posted 21 February 2005 - 8:04 PM

i am not talking about the promo remix 12". this thread is about the official release
love is all.

#4

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 February 2005 - 8:19 PM

DELETED

#5

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 February 2005 - 8:20 PM

DELETED

#6 πŸ™ˆπŸ™‰πŸ™Š   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3831
  • Joined: 06-November 02

Posted 21 February 2005 - 8:27 PM

not a dubplate, thats a funky name for an acetete. the same vinyl press is what your trying to say
I'm a fuckin doughnut

#7 BoywiththeGoldenEyes   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4044
  • Joined: 05-November 04
  • LocationSarrebruck

Posted 21 February 2005 - 9:16 PM

that does not help much - i bought my 12" from an internet store and am a little afraid it might be a bootleg. so, does anyone else have the 12" with the same numbers etched in?

or does anyone know if there are copies with CHEMST21 etched in?
love is all.

#8 πŸ™ˆπŸ™‰πŸ™Š   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3831
  • Joined: 06-November 02

Posted 21 February 2005 - 9:24 PM

Boy with the Golden Eyes EscribiοΏ½:

that does not help much - i bought my 12" from an internet store and am a little afraid it might be a bootleg. so, does anyone else have the 12" with the same numbers etched in?

or does anyone know if there are copies with CHEMST21 etched in?




well it does help, it quite simple. the b-side, acid children has used the same vinyl press as the original electronic battle weapon 7 (chemstdj20). what was the point of creating a new vinyl press which will have the exact same music just to change the etching of the catalogue number on the press??
I'm a fuckin doughnut

#9 BoywiththeGoldenEyes   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4044
  • Joined: 05-November 04
  • LocationSarrebruck

Posted 21 February 2005 - 9:39 PM

the point is: it has always been done. every single release has its unique catalogue number - and it irritates that CHEMST21 is etched CHEMSTDJ20 and CHEMSTDJ21. virgin could afford to create a new vinyl press, they are not a small indie company.



nevertheless, thanks to anType and sneaker
love is all.

#10 πŸ™ˆπŸ™‰πŸ™Š   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3831
  • Joined: 06-November 02

Posted 21 February 2005 - 9:56 PM

well i think your making more outta the situation than there is to talk about.



i was just going through my vinyl. have a look a it began in afrika. my copy has chemstdj-12-a2 etched into it. but the dj bit of the etching has been scribbled out. so this pressing is probably exactly the same as the electronic battle weapon 5 pressing (what do you think of that antype, does that answer some your EBW5 question). so alright they could have corrected your etching on the b-side of your galvanize single. but does it matter, i think your being a little pedantic over this, reading more than there is to read in the situation.
I'm a fuckin doughnut

#11 BoywiththeGoldenEyes   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4044
  • Joined: 05-November 04
  • LocationSarrebruck

Posted 21 February 2005 - 10:09 PM

you're right, maybe i am. but, to come back to where i've started - i wanted to know to be sure it is not a bootleg. there are many bootlegs around at the moment... too many
love is all.

#12

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 February 2005 - 11:16 PM

DELETED

#13 πŸ™ˆπŸ™‰πŸ™Š   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3831
  • Joined: 06-November 02

Posted 21 February 2005 - 11:36 PM

the only question left is why does the white label bootleg copy of it began in afrika have a slightly different mix??



i'm pretty sure when the brothers dish out the initial batch of electronic battle weapons in white label form, 50 or so copies to there dj friend and dj elite. i remember fc kauna having a white label copy of acid children at creamfields last year. and i have seen a picture (although it doesn't mean its real) of a white label copy of 'electronic battle weapon 5' printed in black ink by a stamp (totally different to the white label bootleg). maybe the inital genuine white label pressings had the slightly different edit and it was this pressing that got bootlegged. i bet the full limited run of electronic battle weapon 5 with the red logo has the exact same edit as the commercial release.



you got there in the end antype, with a bit of flukey luck from me.
I'm a fuckin doughnut

#14

  • Group: Guests

Posted 21 February 2005 - 11:41 PM

DELETED

#15 πŸ™ˆπŸ™‰πŸ™Š   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3831
  • Joined: 06-November 02

Posted 21 February 2005 - 11:44 PM

oh and while im thinking of it you'll probably be able to tell whether you got a genuine or fake copy of electronic battle weapon 5 by comparing the etchings to the it began in afrika 12". the only difference should be on the commercial version the 'dj' in the caterlogue should be scribbled out
I'm a fuckin doughnut

#16 ElectronicBattleWarrior   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1249
  • Joined: 21-November 02

Posted 21 February 2005 - 11:48 PM

I have the white label bootleg. I think I collected alot of info on the white label boot leg my copy of what was supposedly a honest copy of EBW 5





I'm not industanding what's going on with the a2 etching stuff and what it has informed you antype. care to enlighten me?



antype plz respond to my pm!!

#17 KngtRdr   User is offline

  • PKA eVermin
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 665
  • Joined: 05-December 02
  • LocationSan Francisco, Los Angeles, Las Vegas

Posted 22 February 2005 - 4:10 PM

It's unbelieveable how many bootlegs are appearing everywhere, of everything. I've purchased too many bootlegs to count, trying to get originals. *sigh*


- @KngtRdr / @9GRecords / Got Glint?

#18

  • Group: Guests

Posted 22 February 2005 - 4:14 PM

DELETED

#19 irishfan

  • Group: Guests

Posted 22 February 2005 - 4:15 PM

this makes me only trust cd's now. have to check my vinyl at home now

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users