Forum
galvanize 12" - mistake or bootleg copy
Page 1 of 1
#1
Posted 21 February 2005 - 7:28 PM
maybe that has been topic in another thread already while i was off, if so - sorry.
my 12" copy of galvanize - CHEMST21 / 0724387659162 - is etched CHEMSTDJ 21 on A side and CHEMSTDJ 20 on B side. mike's the exchange etched in as well. anyone who discovered the same?
my 12" copy of galvanize - CHEMST21 / 0724387659162 - is etched CHEMSTDJ 21 on A side and CHEMSTDJ 20 on B side. mike's the exchange etched in as well. anyone who discovered the same?
love is all.
#8
Posted 21 February 2005 - 9:24 PM
Boy with the Golden Eyes EscribiοΏ½:
that does not help much - i bought my 12" from an internet store and am a little afraid it might be a bootleg. so, does anyone else have the 12" with the same numbers etched in?
or does anyone know if there are copies with CHEMST21 etched in?
well it does help, it quite simple. the b-side, acid children has used the same vinyl press as the original electronic battle weapon 7 (chemstdj20). what was the point of creating a new vinyl press which will have the exact same music just to change the etching of the catalogue number on the press??
I'm a fuckin doughnut
#9
Posted 21 February 2005 - 9:39 PM
the point is: it has always been done. every single release has its unique catalogue number - and it irritates that CHEMST21 is etched CHEMSTDJ20 and CHEMSTDJ21. virgin could afford to create a new vinyl press, they are not a small indie company.
nevertheless, thanks to anType and sneaker
nevertheless, thanks to anType and sneaker
love is all.
#10
Posted 21 February 2005 - 9:56 PM
well i think your making more outta the situation than there is to talk about.
i was just going through my vinyl. have a look a it began in afrika. my copy has chemstdj-12-a2 etched into it. but the dj bit of the etching has been scribbled out. so this pressing is probably exactly the same as the electronic battle weapon 5 pressing (what do you think of that antype, does that answer some your EBW5 question). so alright they could have corrected your etching on the b-side of your galvanize single. but does it matter, i think your being a little pedantic over this, reading more than there is to read in the situation.
i was just going through my vinyl. have a look a it began in afrika. my copy has chemstdj-12-a2 etched into it. but the dj bit of the etching has been scribbled out. so this pressing is probably exactly the same as the electronic battle weapon 5 pressing (what do you think of that antype, does that answer some your EBW5 question). so alright they could have corrected your etching on the b-side of your galvanize single. but does it matter, i think your being a little pedantic over this, reading more than there is to read in the situation.
I'm a fuckin doughnut
#13
Posted 21 February 2005 - 11:36 PM
the only question left is why does the white label bootleg copy of it began in afrika have a slightly different mix??
i'm pretty sure when the brothers dish out the initial batch of electronic battle weapons in white label form, 50 or so copies to there dj friend and dj elite. i remember fc kauna having a white label copy of acid children at creamfields last year. and i have seen a picture (although it doesn't mean its real) of a white label copy of 'electronic battle weapon 5' printed in black ink by a stamp (totally different to the white label bootleg). maybe the inital genuine white label pressings had the slightly different edit and it was this pressing that got bootlegged. i bet the full limited run of electronic battle weapon 5 with the red logo has the exact same edit as the commercial release.
you got there in the end antype, with a bit of flukey luck from me.
i'm pretty sure when the brothers dish out the initial batch of electronic battle weapons in white label form, 50 or so copies to there dj friend and dj elite. i remember fc kauna having a white label copy of acid children at creamfields last year. and i have seen a picture (although it doesn't mean its real) of a white label copy of 'electronic battle weapon 5' printed in black ink by a stamp (totally different to the white label bootleg). maybe the inital genuine white label pressings had the slightly different edit and it was this pressing that got bootlegged. i bet the full limited run of electronic battle weapon 5 with the red logo has the exact same edit as the commercial release.
you got there in the end antype, with a bit of flukey luck from me.
I'm a fuckin doughnut
#15
Posted 21 February 2005 - 11:44 PM
oh and while im thinking of it you'll probably be able to tell whether you got a genuine or fake copy of electronic battle weapon 5 by comparing the etchings to the it began in afrika 12". the only difference should be on the commercial version the 'dj' in the caterlogue should be scribbled out
I'm a fuckin doughnut
#16
Posted 21 February 2005 - 11:48 PM
I have the white label bootleg. I think I collected alot of info on the white label boot leg my copy of what was supposedly a honest copy of EBW 5
I'm not industanding what's going on with the a2 etching stuff and what it has informed you antype. care to enlighten me?
antype plz respond to my pm!!
I'm not industanding what's going on with the a2 etching stuff and what it has informed you antype. care to enlighten me?
antype plz respond to my pm!!
Page 1 of 1