TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers: Pitchfork's review of WATN (is not a positive one at all!) - TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers

Jump to content

home

Forum

Pitchfork's review of WATN (is not a positive one at all!)

  • 3 Pages
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • This topic is locked

#1 Darkstarexodus   User is offline

  • doin' it after dark
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6304
  • Joined: 10-June 04
  • Locationthe Canadian Shield

Posted 02 July 2007 - 2:56 PM

Pitchfork reviewed the album today and gave it a highly disappointing, although perhaps not surprising, score and review. I know most of you hate Pitchfork and would flame them regardless of what they say, but I'm hoping we can take this review and address its criticisms rather than attacking Pitchfork ad hominem.


But I don't see that as being likely. :)


Anyways, here goes... (Interesting that the reviewer compares Do It Again to Timbaland/Timberlake as well. heh.)


Chemical Brothers

We Are The Night

[Astralwerks; 2007]

3.8


It's going to take another few years, a lot of nostalgia, and even more critical evangelism for the Chemical Brothers to be recognized as one of the most all-around consistent acts of the 1990s. More than a decade after the release of their debut album, 1995's Exit Planet Dust, they remain inextricably tied to Big Beat electronica, a genre that had already fallen out of fashion by the time the tech bubble burst. Since most of America's hopes for so-called "electronica" were pinned on a cynically marketed next-big-thingism, its chart failure has tended to overshadow everything else-- including a fair critical appraisal, as Salon's Michelle Goldberg demonstrated in a pan of the Chemical Brothers' 2002 album Come With Us: "Commercially, the mid-to-late-90s conceit that electronic music would wrest the airwaves from guitar rock dinosaurs has proved as fanciful as the idea that online video rental could be a billion-dollar business."


You don't need to have the Chemicals' Singles 93-03 video compilation in your Netflix queue to question the relevance of that statement: Electronica was a failure as a mass-culture lifestyle trend. But it was successful, too, in one important area: producing memorable pop records. Even in the post-crash doldrums of the early 2000s, the Chemical Brothers sustained their creative stride more effectively than most other artists clogging up the modern rock charts 30 notches above them. Albums like Come With Us and 2005's Push the Button were more pacekeepers than trendsetters, sure, but there was a cohesive freedom to them, a sort of universal dance music catchall vibe that cross-evolved through acid house, electro, hip-hop, and whatever else they could layer big, explosive bass over. Even as their returns began to diminish the further they got from the staggering peak of Dig Your Own Hole, the mild creative downturn wasn't significant enough to damage the overall feeling of optimistic, psychedelic egalitarianism embedded in their music.


This, though, this We Are the Night-- no, come on, not now. Not after Fatboy Slim's Palookaville and the Prodigy's Always Outnumbered, Never Outgunned and Orbital's The Blue Album and Daft Punk's Human After All and the last two Moby records. Just because Tom Rowlands and Ed Simons are falling off the cliff a few years later than most of the other once-great hopes of 90s dance music doesn't make the plummet any less frustrating or embarrassing. Not even the low points on Push the Button suggested they were about to tank this hard.


On We Are the Night, the Chemical Brothers have switched from integrators to imitators: Where 1999's Surrender opened with "Music: Response", expertly streamlining the cutting-edge electro-funk of early Timbaland, "Do It Again" sounds like a public domain version of a FutureSex/LoveSounds beat, with perky synths and an aloof radio-dance churn gutlessly approximating the elements that make those tracks work. Guest singer Ali Love turns in a mediocre Timberlake impression-- although even JT himself couldn't pull off a dippy couplet like "got a brain like bubblegum/ Blowing up my cranium."


The album's title track attempts to weave the duo's euphoric buildups and breakdowns into warmed-over Krautrock, but with a beat that never crests, its dynamics are left to a weakly kitschy Perrey-Kingsley melody, damning the track to 6 1/2 minutes of a rickety retro-future parody of the 360-degree treadmill from 2001. "Das Speigel" is an ill-advised stab at minimal house-- have the Chems ever even attempted to pull off minimal anything? -- and after layering on enough electronic giggles, squeals, melodicas, guitars, and extraneous sound effects to a briefly-promising groove, it turns out sounding like something from side 6 of Booka Shade's Sandinista!.


Other autopsies of this album might pin its weaker moments on the guest spots, but those mostly just make an already-bad situation moderately worse. "All Rights Reversed" would still sound like groggy emo if they got somebody besides the Klaxons to mutter close-harmony vocals over its inflated theatricality. It's probably for the best that "Battle Scars" wasn't given to a better singer than Willy Mason: His head-trauma Gordon Lightfoot vocals and the sub-Rod McKuen lyrics ("There's a line in the sand/ Put there by man/ By man whose children built up castles made of stone") are perfectly suited to the track's tedious, xylophone-laden indie sleepwalk. And while there's been a well-earned avalanche of derision aimed at Fatlip's dopey nature-doc rap "The Salmon Dance", he had to work with the beat the Chemicals gave him; most MCs, faced with the prospect of rhyming over something Arthur Baker might have concocted after an afternoon of gorging on vanilla-frosted hash brownies and Spongebob reruns, would probably rap about dancing like a fish on crack, too.


The Chemical Brothers' descent into ineptitude is at least accompanied by a few brief highlights: "Saturate" plays like one of Surrender's acid house throwbacks, complete with Bill Ward-size drums, while "A Modern Midnight Conversation"-- based on a whipcrack cowbell beat and the bassline from Crystal Grass' 1974 psych-disco classic "Crystal World"-- is as euphoric as anything they've done this decade short of "Star Guitar." But those flashes of effortless dancefloor-filling greatness used to be the norm for the Chemical Brothers; as exceptions on an album of colossal blunders, they can only serve as fleeting reminders. I once found it hard to fathom that Dig Your Own Hole was released ten years ago; it's easier to believe now.


-Nate Patrin, July 2, 2007




#2 mcmarsh   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4002
  • Joined: 05-November 02
  • LocationLeeds, UK

Posted 02 July 2007 - 3:08 PM

Sounds like they had the daggers out before even listening to it!!




#3 Slipvin   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2505
  • Joined: 18-January 05

Posted 02 July 2007 - 3:09 PM

I wish I wrote that.


Sadly, I like the album.




#4 whirly

  • Group: Guests

Posted 02 July 2007 - 3:19 PM

I agree, marsh. I think Pitchfork has had it in for the Chemical Brothers since the days after Surrender. Why am I not surprised it got a lousy review from Bitchfork?


Dig Your Own Hole is a great album, non-arguably. But even the slightest hints of "Gee I wish the Chems were like how they were 10 years ago" arguments have been stale going on 10 years now. meh is my thoughts on the review. I'll just have to agree to disagree with the assertions made in the review. I'm glad it's their opinion and not mine. All is still right with the universe, regardless. *shrugs*




#5 surface_to_air   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 287
  • Joined: 27-January 05
  • LocationYork, UK

Posted 02 July 2007 - 3:33 PM

Pardon my french, but I'd love to drop-kick that fucker



Posted Image

#6 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4505
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 02 July 2007 - 4:45 PM

You need to know that this review was pre-written right after Surrender and the titles of the tracks were just filled in afterwards. They haven't listened to it yet and never will.


And for this:


  1. "Das Speigel" is an ill-advised stab at minimal house-- have the Chems ever even attempted to pull off minimal anything?"


they need to be punished hard!


One question: is this a music magazine or a journal for houshold devices?



E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#7 makeskidskill

  • Group: Guests

Posted 02 July 2007 - 4:47 PM

I'd like to shove my foot so far up his ass that he tasted my boots.


Actually, my sig sums up PFM as well as anything ever could.




#8 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4505
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 02 July 2007 - 4:50 PM

And what the heck do they want to say by that: "Krautrock"??? Racialistic morons.



E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#9 makeskidskill

  • Group: Guests

Posted 02 July 2007 - 4:59 PM

Darkstar, this doesn't deserve it's own thread, you should bury it in with the rest of the reviews, and let me delete this one.




#10 pushpop   User is offline

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 45
  • Joined: 08-January 05
  • LocationDublin, Ireland

Posted 02 July 2007 - 5:14 PM

To be honest I think this is another example of a problem which has dogged them since they released Dig Your Own Hole, namely, everything they released after it being compared to it! The reviewer complains that The Chemical Brothers are inextricably tied to DYOH, and then goes on to undermine his point by perpetuating this association when he repeatedly compares everything they've ever done since with said album. Constantly people complain that the Bros post-DYOH work has not matched up to it, and I think certain reviewers and fans alike must make the decision as to whether they are fans of the album or of the band. Either way shut the fuck up, at least it's something different from the mass-produced brain rot we have to endure 90% of the time on our radios and tvs.




#11 prochem   User is offline

  • Accelerator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3037
  • Joined: 30-March 07
  • LocationTORONTO

Posted 02 July 2007 - 5:24 PM

wow, just another retarded review from another retarded person on a retarded website. meh >_>



Electronizkez Van Attacko
Posted Image

#12 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4505
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 02 July 2007 - 5:29 PM

Pushpop: there's nothing left to say!



E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#13 prochem   User is offline

  • Accelerator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3037
  • Joined: 30-March 07
  • LocationTORONTO

Posted 02 July 2007 - 7:02 PM

They say that electronica was a failure.

I say that they are a failure.



Electronizkez Van Attacko
Posted Image

#14 The_Chemical_Sister

  • Group: Guests

Posted 02 July 2007 - 7:15 PM

"Electronica was a failure as a mass-culture lifestyle trend. But it was successful, too, in one important area: producing memorable pop records."


Failure? POP RECORDS!?!??!

Hahahaha. He, ore they or whatever, had a bad day, let's be comprehensive.




#15 Jeanie   User is offline

  • JeanieBeanie!
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7883
  • Joined: 01-March 04
  • LocationAmsterdam

Posted 02 July 2007 - 7:27 PM

i wish that these blogs would only let people who understand the music/scene review records


i hate to say it but its a very american review - totally concerned aboout where it fits into their media-invented isolationalist genres and not actually giving the music much of a listen.


one day 'some reviewers will be more concerned with ís this music any good' and not 'íf i listen to this music will it make me cool in my cultural sub-context'


wanker.




#16 mippio   User is offline

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2907
  • Joined: 22-October 03

Posted 02 July 2007 - 7:29 PM

sorry above was me


x




#17 soundertow   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 621
  • Joined: 20-September 03
  • LocationHelsinki, Finland

Posted 02 July 2007 - 8:58 PM

whew I thought Jeanie said 'media-invented isolationist genres'


About the review:


"Fatlip's dopey nature-doc rap "The Salmon Dance", he had to work with the beat the Chemicals gave him; most MCs, faced with the prospect of rhyming over something Arthur Baker might have concocted after an afternoon of gorging on vanilla-frosted hash brownies and Spongebob reruns, would probably rap about dancing like a fish on crack, too."


Vanilla-frosted? Wow, this reviewer sure can catch the details. A commoner might have thought of chocolate-frosting but no it's definitively vanilla.




#18 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4505
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 02 July 2007 - 9:05 PM

http://www.claudilie.de/lmn/lachen.gif



E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#19 KngtRdr   User is offline

  • PKA eVermin
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 665
  • Joined: 05-December 02
  • LocationSan Francisco, Los Angeles, Las Vegas

Posted 02 July 2007 - 9:11 PM

pushpop - well stated. And yes, the RIAA money machine doesn't like when music can't put shoved down our throats.


I wonder, though, has anyone in the media realized that electronica has INFUSED itself with mainstream music? Just think of all of the themes for TV shows, and commercials...? They've got electronic basslines, synths and drum tracks that would make many DJs jealous.... are they not paying attention?





- @KngtRdr / @9GRecords / Got Glint?

#20 KngtRdr   User is offline

  • PKA eVermin
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 665
  • Joined: 05-December 02
  • LocationSan Francisco, Los Angeles, Las Vegas

Posted 02 July 2007 - 9:11 PM

music can't *be shoved... typo.





- @KngtRdr / @9GRecords / Got Glint?

  • 3 Pages
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users