With surface to air being dubbed an epic set ender buy some critics, it begs the question as to where TPPR will be played?
Of course i think there is nothing more epic than TPPR and that im sure the chems will stick with it as the end track and surface to air will become the mid set peak track.
what do u guys think??
Love is all
V man
Forum
TPPR Or Surface To Air???
MultiQuote
#2
- dork
-
- Group: Moderators
- Posts: 15302
- Joined: 06-November 02
- Locationin the valley of the acid clowns
Posted 18 December 2004 - 6:29 PM
Well, I've never heard the Chems play The Private Psychdelic Reel in their sets. I've only seen them play live 2wice (at a festival) - the first time they closed with Sunshine Underground, the second time, The Test.
The shows still rocked either way, no complaining from me! If they decide to close with Surface to Air, then I trust their judgment.
I would love to hear TPPR live on day though.
The shows still rocked either way, no complaining from me! If they decide to close with Surface to Air, then I trust their judgment.
I would love to hear TPPR live on day though.
be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle
#5
- Veteran
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1249
- Joined: 21-November 02
Posted 18 December 2004 - 8:39 PM
V Man Escribi�:
With surface to air being dubbed an epic set ender buy some critics
What's your source for this. This means that people have reviewed the album, aka promo's have been distrubted to the masses.
iguanapunk Escribi�:
I think this question is like a premature ejaculation.
exactly, none of us have heard anything!
#6
- Veteran
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3831
- Joined: 06-November 02
Posted 18 December 2004 - 11:32 PM
i dont think surface to air will knock the private psychedlic reel of the last tune of the set. they both may be epic but but tppr is more full on overload, ya got to finish with a big bang and surface to air does not do that
I'm a fuckin doughnut
#9
- Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 59
- Joined: 23-October 04
Posted 19 December 2004 - 1:06 AM
Comparing anything to TPPR is unfair.
If Surface to Air is indeed "The underwater song," that means they have already been playing that midset and closing with TPPR as usual.
Anyway, whatever they do, they shouldn't kick TPPR out of the set. I would commit suicide if I went to a Chems gig and they didn't play that (no really, but almost ;-) )
If Surface to Air is indeed "The underwater song," that means they have already been playing that midset and closing with TPPR as usual.
Anyway, whatever they do, they shouldn't kick TPPR out of the set. I would commit suicide if I went to a Chems gig and they didn't play that (no really, but almost ;-) )
#12
- Did ya synth just burp?
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4505
- Joined: 14-February 04
- LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind
Posted 19 December 2004 - 9:13 PM
chemd'up Escribi�:
yes quiter premature
what's that chemd'up???? (you sig)
Is that your dad practising in front of his family pictures before blowing up on saturday night's disco party fever?
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²
#13
- Veteran
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4044
- Joined: 05-November 04
- LocationSarrebruck
Posted 20 December 2004 - 10:37 AM
sneakerbeater Escribi�:
did anyone think chemical boy 89 had returned when reading this thread title??
don't think he'll ever come back.
imo, surface can't beat tppr. want to be TPPR last one to played live on tour and i even wouldn't mind TNK as intro though i've heard it so often now and it might get boring compared to first time live experience with that intro... but still awesome!
love is all.
#14
- Tatsumaki-Senpū kyaku
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 9574
- Joined: 27-February 03
- Location[-+-]
Posted 20 December 2004 - 1:24 PM
Boy with the Golden Eyes Escribi�:
sneakerbeater Escribi�:
did anyone think chemical boy 89 had returned when reading this thread title??
don't think he'll ever come back.
I think he has but with a new alias, right Boy with the Golden Eyes ;)
#15
- Veteran
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4044
- Joined: 05-November 04
- LocationSarrebruck
Posted 21 December 2004 - 12:07 AM
i read his posts and think i am much more intelligent and do not ask those stupid questions but give clever answers abd, btw, am not born 89 ;-) only thing that guy and me seem to have in common is that both of us are boys :D
love is all.
#18
- Tatsumaki-Senpū kyaku
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 9574
- Joined: 27-February 03
- Location[-+-]
Posted 21 December 2004 - 4:14 PM
don't take it to personally, i'm just irratable lately. Your need to post on every subject kind of annoys me, but i'm sure if you have something intelligent to say then carry on.
#19
- Veteran
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4044
- Joined: 05-November 04
- LocationSarrebruck
Posted 21 December 2004 - 11:27 PM
iguanapunk Escribi�:
don't take it to personally, i'm just irratable lately. Your need to post on every subject kind of annoys me, but i'm sure if you have something intelligent to say then carry on.
thought it would have been that. i'll try to post less and only if i've got something interesting to say. though i think that i've got some interesting on almost every topic. i am just very communicative. :-//
love is all.
#20
- Veteran
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3831
- Joined: 06-November 02
Posted 22 December 2004 - 12:11 AM
its like the reincarnation of the first version of antype (but not the new improved version). its good that you have plenty to say, but posting heavily can dilute the content of the forum.
I'm a fuckin doughnut