Forum
dodgy chemical brothers bootleg
#21
Posted 21 July 2004 - 5:32 AM
All I'm saying is that you don't have to be a music conesuer (sp) every moment of your life. My opinion of the track is as follows. Do I think the track is groundbreaking/sensational/a must own: No. If it was on the radio, I'd listen to it.
I mean do you guys really think it is _that_ revolting that you cant even give it a listen?
I mean do you guys really think it is _that_ revolting that you cant even give it a listen?
#25
Posted 21 July 2004 - 5:51 PM
I think it's sad that EBW can't see that his argument is the same as iguanpunk's, only with less style. (EBW is dealing with this without a sense of humour)
By the way, connoiseur.
By the way, connoiseur.
He put on a turn-down collar, a black bow, and wore his Sunday tail-coat. As such, he looked spruce, and what his clothes would not do, his instinct for making the most of his good looks would.
#26
Posted 21 July 2004 - 7:14 PM
Do I think the track is groundbreaking/sensational/a must own: No. If it was on the radio, I'd listen to it.
I mean do you guys really think it is _that_ revolting that you cant even give it a listen?
it would annoy me if it was on the radio. bad music gets on my tits.
i did give it a listen, and it is lazy, unimaginative, cheap rubbish. it also means that someone, somewhere is making money out of fusing 2 classic tracks together badly.
if you think it's ok enough to hear on the radio, then you have no taste in music.
so there. :P
;)
#27
Posted 21 July 2004 - 8:18 PM
mippio Escribi�:
it is lazy, unimaginative, cheap.
I agree.
mippio Escribi�:
if you think it's ok enough to hear on the radio, then you have no taste in music.
If I was a dj i wouldn't spin it but if i was listening to a station and it came on, I wouldn't change the station.