Glastonbury was outstanding, the place itself is just unreal, you can't see it all in the 3 days your there. Some magazines have given out shit reviews though, things like the Arctic Monkeys sounding bad, and not even having Mr. Brightside - The Killers on the top "Sing-a-long" list.

Chemical Brothers was the ultimate way to bring it to an end, when I got home and watched The Who on TV, there was just no way you could compare them. It's a rave compared to a Garden Party, and I feel sorry for those who watched The Who. They're a good band, but they just don't come close to the show the Chemical Brothers put on. The Chemical Brothers were magical, best gig I've seen live, they knocked The Prodigy from my number.1 top spot.

Encore though next time please!!

Well done Guys.

I am indeed in toronto, prochem :)

Here's what Q Magazine (or more, their old skool raver consultants) had to say about the Chems at Glasto.

http://blog.q4music....rfomance_o.html

1. 
   

   Q wrote:
   
   THE CHEMICAL BROTHERS
   
   Some old skool ravers claimed there was “Chemical fatigue” in seeing Tom’n’Ed at Glastonbury again, but when the lovely green and lilac lasers shot out across the Vale of Avalon, illuminating the raindrops, all to the sound of big, stupid tunes like Galvanize, it was hard to resist.
   
   
   

   
   

Stupid tunes?

it would make it great if their opinion of brilliance is cheap pop-rock :)

and a quick look says they think arctic monkeys, so yes. :)

Stupid Tunes...

I mean ok u can disslike a tune.But to name something a " stupid" tune is so , like , what 12 year olds do!