Forum
Bad Audio Don´t Think Cd !
#21
Posted 30 March 2012 - 4:30 PM
why does everything have to be interestingly panned?
I bet at the gig it was pretty much mono, to give even sound across the crowd from various speakers
#23
Posted 06 April 2012 - 2:06 PM
#24
Posted 06 April 2012 - 5:26 PM
satur8, on 29 March 2012 - 12:35 PM, said:
What a bad blow for Tom and Ed.
-----
Mine should arrive in the next day or two. I'm still excited despite this news.
I've finally had a chance to listen to this in my preferred state. When I saw Don't Think in the theater, THIS is the sound I was expecting to hear...not the crap we all got.
I should never doubt the Brothers, and I should not have commented before sampling. This CD sounds awesome.
#25
Posted 08 April 2012 - 3:24 AM
#26
Posted 08 April 2012 - 8:29 AM
#27
Posted 10 April 2012 - 7:35 PM
#29
Posted 10 April 2012 - 9:48 PM
I've been comparing Don't Think's audio to the audio from the high quality live recordings that we've had, such as
- BBC Electric Proms 2007
- Santiago Chile 2004
- Open Air Field 2002
- Amsterdam 2002
- One Big Weekend 2000
and previous offical releases from the Brothers, like
- Temptation/Star Guitar (AmericanEP)
- Believe (The Boxer)
- The Live 05 EP
- Setting Sun (The Reel)
- Out Of Control/Got Glint (Music: Response EP)
Every single one mentioned has some form of panning effect, ranging from subtle (Out Of Control/Got Glint, Setting Sun, One Big Weekend 2000) to extremely obvious (Temptation/Star Guitar, Believe, Electric Proms 2007, Amsterdam 2002). I even checked Glastonbury from this year - yep, panning is very present.
So why would Don't Think be released in mono when their previous broadcasts and official releases were presented in stereo? It appears they regularly do their live shows with at least two channels of sound. Maybe it's possible that they just played at Fuji Rock '11 in mono for even sound across the speakers*. But that's no reason to neuter the release. It doesn't make any sense. Especially since Don't Think has been celebrated as being the first concert film in 7.1 surround sound.
Don't Think's CD succeds over other full show recordings in quite a few ways, especially in the sound mastering. Biff went over these already. Yes, an audience member is much less likely to hear a stereo effect at a live show. But this doesn't erase the fact that many existing recordings, both official and not, actually have panning. Besides, the film itself is in 7.1! We're not expecting something that doesn't exist, because it does. Their shows actually are in stereo. Previous stuff like Temptation/Star Guitar (AmericanEP) completely trumps Don't Think's CD quality since it's so well mastered, and preserves the stereo.
Would you buy a real Chems album in mono? Try listening to any of their albums, there's always panning effects, which helps create a excellent soundscape. Get rid of that, and you lose something. That soundscape is similarly created in all of those quality recordings I mentioned up there. For whatever reason, Don't Think's CD completely lacks it and loses something in the process. Underworld's Everything Everything, released 12 years ago, is in stereo, and holds up better for these reasons.
Don't Think, as a film, is mindblowing and brings the experience of a real live show to you. It's incredibly fantastic and more than anyone could have asked for. There aren't enough adjectives for it. But in the straight audio it fails. It's not our first recorded taste of a live show, we've had those for years. What's expected from a big official release like this is something that puts our radio bootlegs to shame. Don't Think doesn't do that for me. Very cool to have a great quality recording of a 2011. As THE Chemical live experience, though, it's kinda disappointing.
*Which they wouldn't have done. Firstly, it couldn't have been mono, since the video release is indeed in 7.1 surround sound. And there's no reason for Fuji Rock being in stereo either. Here's Hey Boy Hey Girl, Fuji Rock, 1999 with plenty of panning:
#30
Posted 10 April 2012 - 10:51 PM
It is probably the way it is meant to be, but the feeling was kind of different live. I think there were much more mid-high frequencies.
On another topic, the segue in between horse power and chemical beats sounds rather weird. Like you only hear the main acid line of CB while the vocals ("uh") are very quiet in the background.
It is probably more a mixing choice rather than a bad sound quality issue though
#31
Posted 11 April 2012 - 4:38 AM
The best Chems live recorded show IMO is the Santiago de Chile 2004 set, if only we could get the full recording without radio voice overs.
Don't Think is great but I some times feel Adam Smith focused too much on the people and not enough on the performance of Tom & Ed, in some parts of the movie I just wanted to see the stage and the Brothers (Believe build up for example). It's great to see the reaction of the people but at times I felt it was too much.
#32
Posted 11 April 2012 - 9:55 AM
Quote
The best Chems live recorded show IMO is the Santiago de Chile 2004 set, if only we could get the full recording without radio voice overs.
Don't Think is great but I some times feel Adam Smith focused too much on the people and not enough on the performance of Tom & Ed, in some parts of the movie I just wanted to see the stage and the Brothers (Believe build up for example). It's great to see the reaction of the people but at times I felt it was too much.
disagree. I think they have tried to keep the magic by not getting too into the technical side of what they are doing. A stand out moment for me seeing them live is the saturate paint but in the dvd you hardly see the graphics in that we zoom right out to see the crowd and the stage becomes really small.
The dvd has no features, no commentary. Maybe that is a shame or maybe it adds a bit of class.
I think the whole package is executed perfectly.
#33
Posted 11 April 2012 - 2:12 PM
we never see what they are actually really doing on stage. It would have been cool if the camera could have focused a bit more on the gear. The synths and all the tiny LED are definitely part of the magic!
#34
Posted 11 April 2012 - 2:32 PM
Ed n Tom - a geek's edition?
#35
Posted 11 April 2012 - 3:04 PM
So anyway, about the Don't Think CD. I don't have much to add but there's been some interesting (and very techy informative) things being put out. Interesting food for thought and lots of effort put into explaining and comparing!
#37
Posted 11 April 2012 - 7:12 PM
There have been a lot of good points brought up on all sides, particularly by Biff and then Whitenoise.
All in all, the product on my headphones is much better than my theater experience, which was supposed to be brilliant 7.1. It is hard for me to complain when the portable version is better than the original presentation, even if it was the fault of the theater and even if the actual recording is not up to my standard.
Sure, this could have been a better mix, or at the very least in stereo, especially considering the target audience. Still, it is not a bad live recording. It's actually kinda sad that we can compare it to superior bootlegs and know a better product could have been made, but what we don't know is why technical decisions were made during the process.
I haven't been so torn on a Chemical Brothers release in a long time. I'll take it. It could have been better, but it could have never came at all. I'm viewing it as a supplement to the DVD, which somehow makes it easier for me to justify. Not really. But, whatever. No use in complaining since the Brothers did give us what we asked for.
I wish I had a stronger opinion on the whole thing, but we got what we got and it is better than nothing. Remember, this whole thing was a bit of a surprise and moved very quickly. I'll graciously accept it as a gift.
Regarding the tech aspect of the film, I would have personally preferred more focus on Tom and Ed and what they were doing. It clearly wasn't within the artistic direction of the film, but yeah, the HBHG key was much more interesting to me than the antics of any audience member. That being stated as my opinion and preference, I had no problem with the direction of the film. It was well done.
#40
Posted 12 April 2012 - 8:33 AM
JacksRevenge, on 12 April 2012 - 5:33 PM, said:
What he said