Forum
REASONS FOR NO LIVE DVD
#1
Posted 21 February 2006 - 10:06 PM
#4
Posted 21 February 2006 - 11:31 PM
What they do behind all their gear is plenty exposed in the Singles dvd. Like thesouphead, I can't figure out what the hell they are doing - but they must be doing something right. All I know is what they do onstage with all that gear is a magical thing to behold when you are there in the thick of it all.
#6
Posted 22 February 2006 - 1:26 AM
Bring it on !!
You were right to tell em to shut up ;)
I dont have a clue what Tom and Ed do up there , but i like it , so i dont give a shit. And even IF they wouldn't do shit , you can't deny the fact that they are STILL the .... here it comes ....
Lords Of Electronic Music
#7
Posted 22 February 2006 - 2:46 AM
nalaknip Escribi�:
my friend has a theory(he is not really a fan but i am) i was banging on about them not releasing a live dvd and he said that it would expose them to what they really do behind their live rig-up. he said all you see is thm bobbing up and down. his exact quote was "the short one is on a potters wheel. and the lanky one is doing the washing up for the entire crew" who wants to watch that for two hours" shutup u tit is what i quoted back.
if his theory is true then why did MTV broadcasted an entire live ?
#8
Posted 22 February 2006 - 3:04 AM
What's your point again , Ben_J ?
offcourse i disagree with nala's friend. DUH. But Mtv show a lot of crap so that didnt really make sense ;)
#12
Posted 22 February 2006 - 3:57 AM
#13
Posted 22 February 2006 - 4:03 AM
Then, other bands I've seen have been quite boring. Like you say, Biff, just standing there playing instruments and singing.
I reckon it's the same with dance artists. The Chems, though, really go the extra mile in terms of amping up the live show: inspired setlists, fantastic eye candy, and funky little dances and great enthusiasm.
#14 chemdup
Posted 22 February 2006 - 4:32 AM
i knew someone who did the sound for the '99 mtv ema's in dublin. he said he had never seen so much "synthetic stuff" added onto her voice on the sound desk. pitch sustainers, note adjusters etc etc. basically EVERYTHING one can use to make your voice sound good and hit the right notes.
i couldn't give a shit if the lanky student one and the small tubby one do shit behind the desk, they make some of the best electronic music out there and the live shows are the most mind blowing and fun i have ever been to.
so theres my 2 cents ya'll!
p.s, the lanky student one and small tubby one is not my description but a friends....i just think its funny!
#15
Posted 22 February 2006 - 4:36 AM
chemd'up Escribi�:
seeing as someone brought up mariah carey......
i knew someone who did the sound for the '99 mtv ema's in dublin. he said he had never seen so much "synthetic stuff" added onto her voice on the sound desk. pitch sustainers, note adjusters etc etc. basically EVERYTHING one can use to make your voice sound good and hit the right notes.
That's a shame, because she really does have a killer voice. But we expect so much more from our singers now than just to stand there and belt out tunes. With the stage show most singers are expected to put on, it's not surprised that most need some digital help.
I mean, I don't think Britney Spears is a particularly good singer to begin with, but with the type of show she puts on, I defy ANYONE to actually be able to hit all the tough notes without help.
#17
Posted 22 February 2006 - 7:20 AM
I guess I'm so tired of reading the arguments I see every now and again from naysayers who say these things about the Chems shows. It kinda makes me sad because I think live is where the Chems shine in my opinion. I saw them live for the first time and I was a sold die hard. I was really moved.
As far as understanding how it all is put together, it would be fascinating to know or get a behind-the-scenes glimpse of. But at the end of the day if the music affects how you feel, that's all you need to understand.
#18
Posted 22 February 2006 - 9:12 AM
whirlygirl Escribi�:
I guess I'm so tired of reading the arguments I see every now and again from naysayers who say these things about the Chems shows. It kinda makes me sad because I think live is where the Chems shine in my opinion. I saw them live for the first time and I was a sold die hard. I was really moved.
As much as I was already in medium-fan-boy zone already, seeing them live at Coachella seriously changed the way I viewed their music. Changed how I viewed any live music, to be honest: I don't think I went to another concert after Coachella until last weekend, despite usually going to a show every week or two pre-Coachella. There was no point seeing "average" shows after Coachella. I'm finally starting to get over that hangover. Maybe it was the great company ( :D ), maybe it was the drugs, but I'm pretty sure the fact that it was one hell of a motherfucking show had a lot to do with it.
As far as understanding how it all is put together, it would be fascinating to know or get a behind-the-scenes glimpse of. But at the end of the day if the music affects how you feel, that's all you need to understand.
Absolutely true. I really enjoyed Underworld's "Everything, Everything" disc because it combined the visceral rush of their show with the outstanding Tomato visuals, but also showed a fair bit of how they place the music, mess with the mixers, synths, racks, and effects.
Honestly, any band looking to put together a live DVD package needs to view "Everything, Everything", the Nine Inch Nails "And All That Could Have Been", and the Jonathan Demme-directed Talking Heads disc. If you're not going to bother trying to match those standards, don't bother at all.
#19
Posted 22 February 2006 - 3:47 PM
Darkstarexodus Escribi�:
whirlygirl Escribi�:
I guess I'm so tired of reading the arguments I see every now and again from naysayers who say these things about the Chems shows. It kinda makes me sad because I think live is where the Chems shine in my opinion. I saw them live for the first time and I was a sold die hard. I was really moved.
As much as I was already in medium-fan-boy zone already, seeing them live at Coachella seriously changed the way I viewed their music. Changed how I viewed any live music, to be honest: I don't think I went to another concert after Coachella until last weekend, despite usually going to a show every week or two pre-Coachella. There was no point seeing "average" shows after Coachella. I'm finally starting to get over that hangover. Maybe it was the great company ( :D ), maybe it was the drugs, but I'm pretty sure the fact that it was one hell of a motherfucking show had a lot to do with it.
I hear ya! From Chemical afterglow to Chemical hangover. X-D It's hard seeing other bands' live shows when you see your favorite one. With the exception of 1 dj set, the other times I've seen the Chems have been at Coachella and they've always been so spectacular. I really think Coachella last year was an exceptional show out of all of them they did there so far - it was an honor and a blessing to be there... the whole weekend was great and it was cool to be there to witness your fan boy status go from medium to super-size! Man, I'll never forget the looks on yours and ElectronicBattleWarrior's faces, and stash - never seen him affected by music like he was that night...
*sigh*
#20 irishfan
Posted 22 February 2006 - 3:56 PM