Forum
What synth to start ?
Page 1 of 1
#5
Posted 22 February 2006 - 6:29 PM
If you can find a cheap Roland SH-32 or a Novation K-Station/KS-Rack you could do a lot worse. They should both be around �200 second-hand (the Roland maybe slightly cheaper). I've got the Roland SH-32, I consider it the best synth I've got - for those that have the Chemically Imbalanced, the synth madness at the end of 'Machines in danger' is from it.
You could also investigate a Yamaha AN-200, I've not heard it so can't comment on sound - but the specs and layout look ok, and it's got a pattern sequencer on board so you can use it away from the computer. 8)
You could also investigate a Yamaha AN-200, I've not heard it so can't comment on sound - but the specs and layout look ok, and it's got a pattern sequencer on board so you can use it away from the computer. 8)
#6
Posted 22 February 2006 - 11:29 PM
the mickrokorg is wicked, same audio engine as the �600 ms2000, just not as editable. u can get some realyl lush sounds out of it.
the wasp and sh-32 are cool, but it depends if u want versatitliy or not - theyre both monophonic i believe so if u want chords or pads thats out the window.
tbh - id invest in a nice mixing desk and use soft sytnhs and a cool controller, then when u mix your tune send all the synth parts out through the desk to wrm them up - youd be hard pushed to tell the diffence between a soft synth and an analgoue synth imo - its not as good, i admit, but youd be amazed at how much prescence and warmth how much a nice desk will give the mosyt digital of sounds.
the wasp and sh-32 are cool, but it depends if u want versatitliy or not - theyre both monophonic i believe so if u want chords or pads thats out the window.
tbh - id invest in a nice mixing desk and use soft sytnhs and a cool controller, then when u mix your tune send all the synth parts out through the desk to wrm them up - youd be hard pushed to tell the diffence between a soft synth and an analgoue synth imo - its not as good, i admit, but youd be amazed at how much prescence and warmth how much a nice desk will give the mosyt digital of sounds.
#7
Posted 22 February 2006 - 11:39 PM
The SH-32 is polyphonic, it's 4 part multi-timbral too.
But yeah, I support mips in the soft synth department, production is now at a stage where a copy of Cubase and a few VSTs + effects is all you need. You can even get decent analogue desk emulations as VST plug-ins!
But yeah, I support mips in the soft synth department, production is now at a stage where a copy of Cubase and a few VSTs + effects is all you need. You can even get decent analogue desk emulations as VST plug-ins!
#8
Posted 23 February 2006 - 2:10 AM
TheFlamingDead_ Escribi�:
Sorry, they don't really get cheaper than the microkorg, stick to software until you can afford one.
MicroKorg is my second synth, it's a good one and cheaper than the legacy set from korg, really you're not going to get much more for that price. You could try looking for a juno 106 (about the price of microkorgs on ebay and used by the chems in stuff like chemical beats and out of control) or a roland jx3p without the pg200 are cheap too, I have them all and love em. Also check local classifieds they make ebay look like a rip, I found a 909 on there for 400 less than ebay
#9
Posted 23 February 2006 - 7:10 AM
chemicalfan Escribi�:
You could also investigate a Yamaha AN-200, I've not heard it so can't comment on sound - but the specs and layout look ok, and it's got a pattern sequencer on board so you can use it away from the computer. 8)
The sequencer is supposedly a bit sketchy on these, with the first note or so missing when you change the pattern in a song, and it's only a 16-bar sequencer.
The editing potential with these is supposed to be massive, though. Same with the DX-200.
I went with the Korg EA-1 because of its better sequencer and ease of use, as well as a fantastic price (less than 60 quid). However, I do wish it had some of the AN-200's feature set.
#10
Posted 23 February 2006 - 2:18 PM
I've got an EA-1 and a DX-200, the sequencers on both are ok, but they are only monophonic sequencers and both a bit short (the EA-1 only has 64 parts per loop). For sequencing, you've gotta look to software tbh, but I like the way you don't need the computer on to get the workings of a loop going with them.
I think it's worth noting the limitations of the EA-1, the sounds of simple basses and leads are good, but that's all it can do in reality. You can make it do a basic filter sweep, but it's a bit tricky and doesn't sound as good as other synths. The AN-200 looks a lot more featured, so should be able to go places the EA-1 can't. But I haven't heard it, so I can't comment beyond saying it should be good.
Unless you specifically want a vintage synth (like a Juno 106, for example), you'd get more bang-for-your-buck with a virtual analogue synth like the EA-1 or something like that. Plus, being new-ish as opposed to 20 years old, you're less likely to encounter problems with it. And there is less to go wrong inside the thing! Personally, I'd opt for a second hand VA synth, check out all that's been mentioned so far. You should be able to get a Korg MS2000R for less than �200 second hand, they're pretty reasonable. Although as stated earlier, for cracking into production check out a software sequencer that can host VSTs (like Cubase, or something like that) as there are literally thousands of software synths out there, a lot of them for free. Invest in a controller (like a Behringer BCR2000) and then you can tweak the soft synths without using the mouse 8)
I think it's worth noting the limitations of the EA-1, the sounds of simple basses and leads are good, but that's all it can do in reality. You can make it do a basic filter sweep, but it's a bit tricky and doesn't sound as good as other synths. The AN-200 looks a lot more featured, so should be able to go places the EA-1 can't. But I haven't heard it, so I can't comment beyond saying it should be good.
Unless you specifically want a vintage synth (like a Juno 106, for example), you'd get more bang-for-your-buck with a virtual analogue synth like the EA-1 or something like that. Plus, being new-ish as opposed to 20 years old, you're less likely to encounter problems with it. And there is less to go wrong inside the thing! Personally, I'd opt for a second hand VA synth, check out all that's been mentioned so far. You should be able to get a Korg MS2000R for less than �200 second hand, they're pretty reasonable. Although as stated earlier, for cracking into production check out a software sequencer that can host VSTs (like Cubase, or something like that) as there are literally thousands of software synths out there, a lot of them for free. Invest in a controller (like a Behringer BCR2000) and then you can tweak the soft synths without using the mouse 8)
#11
Posted 23 February 2006 - 3:16 PM
chemicalfan Escribi�:
I've got an EA-1 and a DX-200, the sequencers on both are ok, but they are only monophonic sequencers and both a bit short (the EA-1 only has 64 parts per loop). For sequencing, you've gotta look to software tbh, but I like the way you don't need the computer on to get the workings of a loop going with them.
I think it's worth noting the limitations of the EA-1, the sounds of simple basses and leads are good, but that's all it can do in reality. You can make it do a basic filter sweep, but it's a bit tricky and doesn't sound as good as other synths. The AN-200 looks a lot more featured, so should be able to go places the EA-1 can't. But I haven't heard it, so I can't comment beyond saying it should be good.
If you've got the DX-200, then you're well familiar with the limitations of the AN-200's sequencer. Fair play, then. From everything I hear, the AN-200 has wicked sounds.
And yeah, the EA-1 is definetly VERY limited, but what it does do it does reasonably well. Just a cool toy, really. Something to jam with when you're drunk. :D
#12
Posted 23 February 2006 - 9:06 PM
The EA-1 is still a good little synth in it's own right, just don't expect too much (a bit like an SH-101 in that respect :P )
The main hook in "Take Two" is the EA-1, as is the 'solo', it's pretty good for those sort of sounds, and it can do quality gritty basslines with a little help from a distortion FX box or plugin
The main hook in "Take Two" is the EA-1, as is the 'solo', it's pretty good for those sort of sounds, and it can do quality gritty basslines with a little help from a distortion FX box or plugin
#15
Posted 26 February 2006 - 1:40 PM
Ben_j Escribi�:
Foxboy Escribi�:
Ask Tom and Ed to buy you one for your birthday :P X-D
Good Idea !
Tom, Ed, if you read this ... My birthday is on November the 5th. And Saint Benjamin is on March the 31st ! :D
Mine the 17th March!
Ive read that the Moog prodigy is a goog bit of kit. but really I think it would be better myself buying something brand new.
Page 1 of 1