TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers: The Frequency! - TheChemicalBrothers.com - Official Forum for The Chemical Brothers

Jump to content

home

Forum

The Frequency!

  • 9 Pages
  • +
  • « First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • Last »
  • You cannot reply to this topic

#81 chemicalreaction   User is online

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 19 December 2013 - 11:03 PM

BUT STILL, the track is not that good to get excited over.

#82 WhiteNoise   User is online

  • Hmm... I was confused.
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2230
  • Joined: 28-November 09
  • LocationPurdue University

Posted 20 December 2013 - 1:13 AM

I actually love it. The "melody" has been bumping around in my head non stop.
SAVE FERRIS FORUM

#83 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4504
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 20 December 2013 - 1:58 AM

View Postchemicalreaction, on 20 December 2013 - 12:03 AM, said:

BUT STILL, the track is not that good to get excited over.

You wanna get into a "nothing but pleasure" discussion again? Do you? Dooooo you?
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#84 chemicalreaction   User is online

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 20 December 2013 - 2:10 AM

View PostCsar, on 20 December 2013 - 2:58 AM, said:

You wanna get into a "nothing but pleasure" discussion again? Do you? Dooooo you?


It would be my pleasure. BUT, its the holidays. I don't want to ruin anyone's chemical high by being negative now. Only about half of the recent tracks sound promising, the other half are like the tracks "superflash" or "EBW 9" Yeah its good but not good enough, you won't see anyone talking about it years from now.XTC remix and Through me are legit tracks with street cred tho.

Its fans like WhiteNoise who get excited over the simplest of melodies. Even if a Chems track is nothing but a single "beep", WhiteNoise would love it and buy that single and all its copies in the town.

#85 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4504
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 20 December 2013 - 2:16 AM

View Postchemicalreaction, on 20 December 2013 - 3:10 AM, said:

It would be my pleasure. BUT, its the holidays. I don't want to ruin anyone's chemical high by being negative now. Only about half of the recent tracks sound promising, the other half are like the tracks "superflash" or "EBW 9" Yeah its good but not good enough, you won't see anyone talking about it years from now.XTC remix and Through me are legit tracks with street cred tho.

Its fans like WhiteNoise who get excited over the simplest of melodies. Even if a Chems track is nothing but a single "beep", WhiteNoise would love it and buy that single and all its copies in the town.


I'm gettin' the feeling Santa is not in town for you!
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#86 chemicalreaction   User is online

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 20 December 2013 - 2:25 AM

All I want for Christmas is good music and unfortunately your e=mc^2 formula doesn't work.

#87 WhiteNoise   User is online

  • Hmm... I was confused.
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2230
  • Joined: 28-November 09
  • LocationPurdue University

Posted 20 December 2013 - 2:40 AM

View Postchemicalreaction, on 19 December 2013 - 8:10 PM, said:

Its fans like WhiteNoise who get excited over the simplest of melodies. Even if a Chems track is nothing but a single "beep", WhiteNoise would love it and buy that single and all its copies in the town.

You fucking know it. I'd buy 20 of em.
SAVE FERRIS FORUM

#88 chemicalreaction   User is online

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 20 December 2013 - 2:53 AM

Its hard to reason with someone so inlove with chems.

#89 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4504
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 20 December 2013 - 3:05 AM

View Postchemicalreaction, on 20 December 2013 - 3:25 AM, said:

All I want for Christmas is good music and unfortunately your e=mc^2 formula doesn't work.

That formula is flawless and you know it.
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#90 WhiteNoise   User is online

  • Hmm... I was confused.
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2230
  • Joined: 28-November 09
  • LocationPurdue University

Posted 20 December 2013 - 3:39 AM

View Postchemicalreaction, on 19 December 2013 - 8:53 PM, said:

Its hard to reason with someone so inlove with chems.

C'mon bruv, it would be by The Chemical Brothers. That would make it the illest, dopest beep evar.
SAVE FERRIS FORUM

#91 Explud   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 204
  • Joined: 13-June 08
  • LocationMoscow, Russia

Posted 22 February 2014 - 11:32 PM



34:18 - "frequency" remix in good guality.

#92 Ben_j   User is offline

  • Chimney Fisting !
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7490
  • Joined: 25-January 05
  • LocationParis, France

Posted 23 February 2014 - 12:26 AM

View PostExplud, on 23 February 2014 - 12:32 AM, said:



34:18 - "frequency" remix in good guality.


wow ! "good quality" is an understatement

#93 sandelic   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 405
  • Joined: 02-February 10
  • LocationCroatia

Posted 23 February 2014 - 12:55 AM

Muchas gracias!

#94 MadPooter   User is offline

  • Spritual lifter
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4353
  • Joined: 03-May 05
  • LocationSan Francisco, CA

Posted 23 February 2014 - 2:25 AM

View PostExplud, on 22 February 2014 - 3:32 PM, said:



34:18 - "frequency" remix in good guality.


God damn I'm always continually impressed by 2ManyDjs. Maybe even the new Soulwax album will be released sometime before I die, too....

#95 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4504
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 23 February 2014 - 9:56 AM

View PostBen_j, on 23 February 2014 - 1:26 AM, said:

wow ! "good quality" is an understatement

Yeah. Seems like it was recorded squarely from the mixing desk. That's probably why our fucking media authorities have been blocking this. Those sleazy jerks...

View PostMadPooter, on 23 February 2014 - 3:25 AM, said:

God damn I'm always continually impressed by 2ManyDjs. Maybe even the new Soulwax album will be released sometime before I die, too....

Soulwax are alway entertaining and have impressed me ever since I stumbled across them by their sheer variety of styles and ability to mix so many different types of genres in unique way. It's always energetic and never boring because you feel their almost unconstrained love for music and music genres that is embodied in their varied dj sets.
Besides, they also managed to create an own trademark sound with their own songs and remixes that one would almost always immediately recognize as one of theirs. I admire that.

I'd love to see them live one day.
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

#96 Explud   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 204
  • Joined: 13-June 08
  • LocationMoscow, Russia

Posted 23 February 2014 - 12:36 PM

View PostBen_j, on 23 February 2014 - 5:26 AM, said:

wow ! "good quality" is an understatement

Oh, of course the camrip video sounds much better!

#97 skyscraper   User is offline

  • Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 712
  • Joined: 29-January 12

Posted 23 February 2014 - 3:21 PM

View PostMadPooter, on 23 February 2014 - 2:25 AM, said:

Maybe even the new Soulwax album will be released sometime before I die, too....

That would be nice alright.

Thanks for the post Explud. That sound quality is indeed fantastic.

I'm lucky enough to have seen these guys perform Night Versions live several times, dj without album/single cover visuals and dj with album/single cover visuals (oh, and took a swig from their Whisky bottle -very generous), but I probably haven't really paid attention to their dj-ing from a stage viewpoint before watching this vid. I understand that they used DVD's to DJ (VJ) with the album covers, but it seems that they use USB sticks rather than CD's in their Pioneer CDJ machines when just dj-ing music.
Does anyone use CD's anymore? Just wondering.

#98 chemicalreaction   User is online

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7269
  • Joined: 05-November 02

Posted 23 February 2014 - 7:14 PM

That dj set is hottt start to finish. Need to burn that on a cd asap.

#99 Ben_j   User is offline

  • Chimney Fisting !
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7490
  • Joined: 25-January 05
  • LocationParis, France

Posted 24 February 2014 - 5:46 PM

Erol Alkan is offering a mug to whoever wan identify correctly the music on his homepage, which is, you guessed it, the Frequency remix...
Does it mean I was right after all it's an Erol Alkan stuff after all, a new "Erol Alkan Extended Rework" of a Klaxons track produced by Tom ?

At least we should know soon enough, as I guess he will give the answer

#100 Csar   User is offline

  • Did ya synth just burp?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4504
  • Joined: 14-February 04
  • LocationA planet, fucked up by mankind

Posted 24 February 2014 - 6:25 PM

View PostBen_j, on 24 February 2014 - 6:46 PM, said:

Erol Alkan is offering a mug to whoever wan identify correctly the music on his homepage, which is, you guessed it, the Frequency remix...
Does it mean I was right after all it's an Erol Alkan stuff after all, a new "Erol Alkan Extended Rework" of a Klaxons track produced by Tom ?

At least we should know soon enough, as I guess he will give the answer


Cool beans. I'm curious how it's gonna turn out: Erol or Tom?
E(argasm) = m(usic) x c(hemicals)²

  • 9 Pages
  • +
  • « First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • Last »
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users